win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: G Force solid vs SuperNova  (Read 736 times)

Storm269

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
G Force solid vs SuperNova
« on: January 03, 2008, 01:22:10 AM »
Is it true that the reason why the SuperNova goes longer then the Solid is because it is a particle ball ? Your comments please....thanks !
--------------------
In my bag:
G Force SuperNova
G Force SuperNova XP
Crystal Clear Diamond Buzzsaw

 

T-GOD

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2141
Re: G Force solid vs SuperNova
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2008, 10:17:35 AM »
I think it's because of the out of box finish. =:^D

LaneHammer20

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1710
Re: G Force solid vs SuperNova
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2008, 10:30:13 AM »
the particle in the Supernova generally would make a ball start up sooner, but, alough I don't have the specs on each at hand that plays a big part, and as TGOD said, the surface on the G force solid is much lower than the SUpernova's OOB surface.
--------------------
I thought my Hammers hit hard, until I whipped a LM/L ball into the pocket. WOW!

Arsenal:
-Terminator
-Big Bang
-Buzz
-Black Widow
-Hawgzilla
-Spare Tire

crankncrash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 967
Re: G Force solid vs SuperNova
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2008, 12:10:52 PM »
That would be the only reason a partical ball would go longer than a solid, all things equal that is.   Now that is not to say that the cover base on the partical ball is less sensitive to dry, so it APPEARS to creep down the lane before making a transition.  But IMO No there is no way that particals make it go longer, they add friction in theory, so they should not promote a ball going down the lane.