win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers  (Read 14861 times)

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« on: July 10, 2013, 08:27:51 PM »
What was the last Lane 1 ball produced to use Brunswick covers? Always been curious.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

 

Maine Man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2126
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2013, 11:06:52 AM »
Yeah dougb, I wasn't sure if Columbia poured the G-Force line or not. I am pretty sure that the Uranium HRG was a Columbia poured ball.
Logged
James Goulding
Bowler Builders Pro Shops
Radical Staff
F.D.D.S. Tournament Director

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2013, 01:21:16 PM »
Quote from: loop_zero on July 11, 2013, 04:11:17 AM
Now i am wondering.  Any one know who/what covers are on the current lane 1 balls?

Not sure what you heard or why you brought this subject up.
I asked and someone who should know says 900G is still manufacturing Lane#1 balls
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

batbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2013, 10:06:48 PM »
Columbia did pour a few before Ebonite bought Columbia! The 900 Global plant is the old Columbia plant in San Antonio! Just my $.02, Bruce
Logged
Bruce Campbell
Coaches aren't born, they are made!
USBC Silver Certified Coach
          
www.rotogrip.com
www.stormbowling.com
www.radicalbowling.com
www.damngoodbowling.com

Changing bowling, one bowler at a time!

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2013, 07:02:43 AM »
Quote from: batbowler on July 11, 2013, 10:06:48 PM
Columbia did pour a few before Ebonite bought Columbia! The 900 Global plant is the old Columbia plant in San Antonio! Just my $.02, Bruce

Actually about 6 months ago, more or less, they were in the midst of moving to a new plant in the same city, SA.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Strapper_Squared

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4231
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2013, 08:50:55 AM »
Just prior to the g force  balls...   Maybe the Uranium series?    I loved original carbide, the c2 cored balls...and maybe alone, but like the cranberry.
Logged
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

hyme29

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2013, 03:58:02 PM »
I have had alot of lane one balls and my 3 favorites in no specific order were the pink panther,pearl cherry C2,& gforce evolution.... The original curve was awesome too. I also had both a pearl cherry bomb and black cherry bomb those didnt roll well for me ... But the premiums so.e guys pay or ask for are crazy..
Logged

Doug Sterner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4395
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #22 on: July 12, 2013, 09:01:44 PM »
If I am not mistaken the Carbide + was the straw that broke the camel's back between Lane 1 and Brunswick. The Enriched Uranium was the last of the successful Brunswick poured Lane 1 balls.

Oddly enough hybrid coverstocks are all the rage today. Lane 1 had the first hybrid I can remember being called a hybrid.....the Hybrid Dirty Bomb in 2005.

Go figure.....
Logged
Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

Proud Member of the NRA
Fighting to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #23 on: July 13, 2013, 04:47:05 PM »
Quote from: Doug Sterner on July 12, 2013, 09:01:44 PM
If I am not mistaken the Carbide + was the straw that broke the camel's back between Lane 1 and Brunswick. The Enriched Uranium was the last of the successful Brunswick poured Lane 1 balls.

Oddly enough hybrid coverstocks are all the rage today. Lane 1 had the first hybrid I can remember being called a hybrid.....the Hybrid Dirty Bomb in 2005.

Go figure.....

I believe the Hot Rod Hybrid trumped the Hybrid Dirty Bomb by a few months... it's on the approved list at December 2004
Logged

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #24 on: July 13, 2013, 05:44:56 PM »
What is the true definition of a hybrid coverstock? This is a term that came about around that time but is likely not regulated in any way to mean say a 50/50 mix or 60/40 ect. It is a term introduced that could have been around for much longer. (Reactice urethane/reactive resin ect)
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #25 on: July 13, 2013, 06:18:02 PM »
Quote from: kidlost2000 on July 13, 2013, 05:44:56 PM
What is the true definition of a hybrid coverstock? This is a term that came about around that time but is likely not regulated in any way to mean say a 50/50 mix or 60/40 ect. It is a term introduced that could have been around for much longer. (Reactice urethane/reactive resin ect)

I was not talking about merely the coverstock being blended.  I was referring to the ball being advertised as featuring a "Hybrid" cover or being labeled as such. I assumed that was what Doug was referring to as well.

There was a Surge Limited Edition manufactured by Columbia that was noted as having a hybrid urethane coverstock, but in this case it was referring to mica being added to the urethane cover, not the blending of two different cover types.
Logged

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #26 on: July 13, 2013, 06:25:32 PM »
I understand. Just wanting to know if theres an industry standard or the definition and how much it may have been used prior to the label "hybrid" and also since the term. What balls that may be a hybrid and never been labelled as such. Out of curiosity.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #27 on: July 13, 2013, 06:57:07 PM »
Quote from: kidlost2000 on July 13, 2013, 06:25:32 PM
I understand. Just wanting to know if theres an industry standard or the definition and how much it may have been used prior to the label "hybrid" and also since the term. What balls that may be a hybrid and never been labelled as such. Out of curiosity.

I remember the Scout Urethane Hi Flare. It was not only urethane, it was also a solid/pearl combo coverstock. It was never marketed as such.
http://www.123bowl.com/ball.cfm?ballid=2721
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #28 on: July 13, 2013, 06:59:24 PM »
Quote from: J_Mac on July 13, 2013, 06:18:02 PM
Quote from: kidlost2000 on July 13, 2013, 05:44:56 PM
What is the true definition of a hybrid coverstock? This is a term that came about around that time but is likely not regulated in any way to mean say a 50/50 mix or 60/40 ect. It is a term introduced that could have been around for much longer. (Reactice urethane/reactive resin ect)

I was not talking about merely the coverstock being blended.  I was referring to the ball being advertised as featuring a "Hybrid" cover or being labeled as such. I assumed that was what Doug was referring to as well.

There was a Surge Limited Edition manufactured by Columbia that was noted as having a hybrid urethane coverstock, but in this case it was referring to mica being added to the urethane cover, not the blending of two different cover types.

Both the regular Surge and the Power Surge had mica added to the solid coverstock.
http://www.123bowl.com/ball.cfm?ballid=554
I still have one of each.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2013, 07:46:42 PM »
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane 1/ Brunswick covers
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2013, 09:32:07 PM »
Quote from: J_Mac on July 13, 2013, 07:46:42 PM
Jeff, I was referring to this ball...

http://www.123bowl.com/ball.cfm?ballid=1038
http://columbia300.com/products/detail_retired_balls/surge_limited/

Understood.
Not sure how Columbia might have referred it as a Hybrid when the Scout Hi-Flare urethane wasn't.
I just was saying that the regular Surges also had mica (used as particles, like Storm and Radical had done) yet also were NOT referred to as hybrids. Not sure why, but as has been mentioned a hybrid can be a combination of many different types. LaneMasters mixed particle pearl with particle solids. Storm mixed particle solid with plain resin solid (Secret or Special Agent).
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »