BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Lane #1 => Topic started by: smer on April 29, 2007, 11:52:21 AM
-
Started throwing Lane1 stuff 3 or 4 years ago. What excited me was that they did not take a ball, tweek it a little so it hooked 1 board more, change the name, and call it the next bowling ball like Columbia 300 or Brunswick did. Every ball that Lane1 made seemed to have a purpose. Is that changing? Seems that a lot of their bowling equipment does the same thing. Dont want to start a big argument, just some thoughts. I do love my Lane1 stuff.
--------------------
was a track head, than a proud member of F.O.S., but ebonite is getting very interesting.
-
Sorry I don't follow you... They've come out with new cores and have changed companies who pour they stuff. And all of the latest balls are very different from each other....
-
quote:
Sorry I don't follow you... They've come out with new cores and have changed companies who pour they stuff. And all of the latest balls are very different from each other....
Seriously, they have. The new core, coverstocks, differentials, rg's, they have changed dramatically.
--------------------
Coming soon: www.kennyskidmorebowling.com !
-
quote:
Maybe its the wallshot..?
--------------------
This Season:
300 - Brunswick Ultimate Inferno
300 - Track Heat
289 - Storm Eraser
Finished in Top 16 in Kansas City Open.
¡Viva la Nación de Brunswick!
Even then one should see a difference.... 
--------------------
"Have fun and bowl well!" - Grayson
XXXL
Tsunami
Machine NIB
2x Radical Inferno NIB
H2O NIB
Cobalt Bomb NIB
and by the way... I am a "Fritz" a "Jerry"... I am from Germany! (And please don't call me Kraut! Cause then I call you Dumbarse)
-
Well I wouldn't know if their balls react the same. If they are anything like the Cobalt Solid, then I'll pass on the rest of their products. I will make a thread asking about this ball too since I have gotten PM's agreeing with my VERY BAD review on this ball from Lane #1 fans.
--------------------
Current Arsenal (http://"http://s132.photobucket.com/albums/q21/mikecart1/Bowling%20Arsenal/")
Brunswick Fury
Columbia 300 EPX T1
Storm X-Factor Vertigo
Ebonite The One
Hammer Black Widow x 2
Ebonite Xcel Particle
Lane #1 Cobalt Bomb Solid
Storm Trauma ER
Storm El Nino X-IT
Brunswick Quantum Helix
Brunswick Quantum Double Helix
Storm Recharge
Columbia 300 Messenger Ti
Ebonite Vortex Afterburner
Storm Hit Blue Pearl
Ebonite 14 Fun Ball
Averages: Season 206.467; 2007 Year 213.067; 2007 Tourney 178.029;
Black Widow: Average 244.100; High Game 279
BR Member Since: April 3, 2001
-
quote:
Well I wouldn't know if their balls react the same. If they are anything like the Cobalt Solid, then I'll pass on the rest of their products.
I posted in your thread agreeing with you I was not a fan of the Solid Cobalt. But I asure you they all react differently the that ball.
-
Let me try to clarify. When I started getting serious about bowling, Columbia had just come out with the Black U-Dot. Great ball. Than Hammer came out with the Blue Hammer. If you owned those two balls(and a plastic for really dry) you had everything you needed. Now I know than a partical reacts differant than reactive which reacts different than a pearl. I do not own every ball that Lane 1 has made but have had a chance to throw several. My Super Carbide reacts the same as the Super Carbide Bomb which reacts the same as a friend's solid blue Uranium. My Golden Nugget reacts the same as another friend's Tsunami. That is why this year I bought an Infinite One. It is a totally different look. I would like to get a totally new arsenal this year from Lane 1 , but do not want to spend $500-$600 for new equipment that reacts like old equipment.
--------------------
was a track head, than a proud member of F.O.S., but ebonite is getting very interesting.