win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Comparison Dirty VS Uranium Solid Vs Pearl Carbide  (Read 752 times)

SrKegler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
Comparison Dirty VS Uranium Solid Vs Pearl Carbide
« on: November 08, 2004, 07:43:27 PM »
Haven't seen either ball in my area yet.  I'm still using the Pearl Carbide so any comparisons to it would be really helpful.  

--------------------
~~~SrK - Have balls, will travel

Spending the kids inheritance one tournament at a time.
Have Balls - Will Travel


RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones

 

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: Comparison Dirty VS Uranium Solid Vs Pearl Carbide
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2004, 10:36:42 AM »
I have all of them the dirty bomb is way longer and snappier in the backend, my solid uranium is much smoother with a nice arc the whole lane very easy to adjust off the move. My pearl carbide is earlier than the solid uranium and bleeds off energy much quicker the SU and just does not have the pop like the Su does. When you come out in january to vegas with andrew i can meet all of you and let you throw the dirty bomb and uranium solid if you did not buy them yet. MY money would say pickup a uranium or uranium solid over a dirty bomb but the lane gurus will try to sell you on the newest greatest plus i know were there are new carbides in stock here in vegas if you would like another pearl carbide.

SrKegler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
Re: Comparison Dirty VS Uranium Solid Vs Pearl Carbide
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2004, 12:20:37 AM »
Thanks.  Looking forward to seeing you.  I'm only planning on bringing the PCB and the XXXL out with me.  Drill new stuff up to match the conditions.  

You on our team by any chance?


--------------------
~~~SrK - Have balls, will travel

Spending the kids inheritance one tournament at a time.
Have Balls - Will Travel


RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones