Post by: wer4u2nv on November 16, 2007, 12:50:59 AM
Post by: MegaMav on November 16, 2007, 08:53:21 AM
--------------------
BowlingChat.net (http://"http://www.bowlingchat.net") - "Welcome to the Underground"
BowlingWiki.net (http://"http://www.bowlingwiki.net") - "Where Bowlers Write History"
Post by: novawagonmaster on November 16, 2007, 10:06:10 AM
If looking for a good one/two punch...Supernova and Supernova XP.
In my mind, the Pearl Uranium would be a snug fit right in between them.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.
Post by: BuzzsawCrazy on November 16, 2007, 01:42:58 PM
--------------------
In the bag:
Pearl Cherry C/2(2)
Cranberry
Pro Purple
Enriched Uranium
Cobalt Pearl
G-Force
Super Carbide Bomb
Crystal Diamond
Hack-Saw (RARE!!)
No Mercy
Post by: rhbowling07 on November 16, 2007, 02:50:21 PM
Post by: triggerman on November 17, 2007, 12:20:47 AM
I as well as others on here appreciate everyons input, but please dont comment on something you have not even thrown yet and make a comparison
Eric, we discussed this at great length, please take into account that people are recommending one ball over one they have not even thrown yet
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com
Triggerman
F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud
Lane #1 Baby
Edited on 11/17/2007 1:21 AM
Post by: novawagonmaster on November 28, 2007, 03:57:40 PM
The HRG was the straightest of the bunch, and therefore the easiest to control. It is a low flaring ball, so this is of no surprise. The Evolution was a little stronger and much more angular off the break. The XP was a little stronger yet, and was smoother than the Evo at the break, yet more angular than the HRG. The Pearl Uranium covered more boards than the other three balls, but was only slightly stronger than the XP...these two performed pretty close to each other shot after shot with the PU only covering 1 or two more boards. I did not take my original Supernova because I know that ball is a good bit stronger than all of the pearls listed.
So, in closing, I maintain my original stance on this topic.
If only buying one ball, you cannot go wrong if you can find an original Pearl Uranium. The XP would be a close fit if you cannot find one. And lastly, the Supernova and Supernova XP will be a devastating one-two punch!
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.
Post by: triggerman on November 28, 2007, 08:35:33 PM
and you are right the solid and xp are a very tough 1-2 to beat
Thanks for a great comparison, I think that would shed a lot for most people
what do you think of the hit of the xp and solid vs the heavy uraniam cores?
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com
Triggerman
F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud
Lane #1 Baby
Post by: novawagonmaster on November 29, 2007, 06:44:17 AM
quote:
what do you think of the hit of the xp and solid vs the heavy uraniam cores?
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com
Triggerman
F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud
Lane #1 Baby
Again...very close. The PU may actually hit a little harder, but I seem to notice the pins staying slightly lower with the XP. I had more "blowout" leaves with the PU. The XP seemed to mix the rack a little more.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.
Post by: Brickguy221 on November 29, 2007, 11:28:30 AM
quote:
I seem to notice the pins staying slightly lower with the XP.
Don't mean to hi-jack the topic, but what is in a ball where one ball will make the pins stay lower than another ball? I have always noticed that my Enriched Uranium seems to make the pins stay lower than my other balls. I use the same release on all of my balls, just play different angles with them.
--------------------
Brick
Post by: Warren300 on November 29, 2007, 11:40:16 AM