Still not making sense there, scooter.
See, this is going to look pissy and technical, but you did say "best ball made" without qualifying that statement. From this side of the screen, how is a reader to know whether you meant "ever", or "of Global covers", or of "Columbia covers", or of "currently listed on Lane #1 website", or of "in scooter's bag right now", or however else you wish to qualify your statement.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say.
As for the Nebula being the best "current ball"?
You will get more votes for the Supernova. It is useable over a wider range of conditions. Is the Nebula a good ball? Yes. As long as you are matched up with it (and this is true of any ball).
As for the Nebula being a better ball than the HRG???
WTF mate! They are two very different pieces.
I know some guys are shooting great scores with the Nebula, while I happen to be averaging 250 over the last three outings with the HRG. Does that make one ball better than the other? Nope. Just different. The Nebula would hook off my hand at one local house. The HRG is the perfect balance of low flare and mild cover, yet still hits and carries very good. It's all about matching up.
I know you shot well with the Nebula and you are excited about it. But to come on here (as the representative of a pro shop) and say it's the "best ball"...well, there are alot of "less educated" who will take your opinion as gospel and run out to buy a ball that may not suit them. This site is, in fact, BALLREVIEWS, so I just ask that you put a little more thought into your review. Nothing wrong with saying you shot well with it and it's a great ball.
Just sayin'
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.