What?
IF the MB marking is like with every other asym ball (ecept the Hammer HART concept of course) I would not say it should be put on the track in general
But I would go with either this resource for layout:
http://www.bowlingknowledge.com/tips.htmlesspecially this here:
http://www.bowlingknowledge.com/tips/mario/mario_1030&1030strong_image002.jpgor you take a look at this site explaining the dual angle layout system:
https://www.buddiesproshop.com/114/Mo_Pinel_Dual_Angle_Layout_Technique.htmI see a big difference in my two H2Os (Tsunami and H2O): On my Tsunami the MB is much close to the Track then on my H2O yet my H2O with core/coverstock combination has much more backend!
In the first link they say you cannot make a skid snap ball out of a smooth ball! ... and that is true if you remember that the most reaction is dictated by the coverstock. When you take a look at the Vid Mike is throwing a stacked drilled SN and yet the ball rolls smooth.
So I dare to speculate that on your ball with the actual layout the MB is so close to your PAP that it won't create much backend with your style..... just a guess.
But just to confuse you more I also dare to say take a look at the drillsheet of the SN first. Maybe putting the MB in your track will give you the most hook on the backend as it is the "label" layout and on the drillsheet says it has the most flare and backend.
I hope your ball turns out as you want it.
And just a last question: did you try altering the surface?
Many words and I hope at least 2 or 3 can help you
but I would definitivly say that the SN is anything but compareable with the NM Core concept as long as I hear nothing different from Lane#1.
--------------------
"Have fun and bowl well!" - Grayson "Some things are made so even idiots won't fail using them.... But I aks what about the genius?" - Grayson (\ /)
(x_x)
c.(')(')
Edited on 12/5/2007 4:46 PM