win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: The Buzzbomb  (Read 4567 times)

Bar5003

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1627
The Buzzbomb
« on: January 02, 2008, 03:46:19 AM »
Logged

 

triggerman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: The Buzzbomb
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2008, 09:12:16 AM »
as I stated, I am not in the know, and mine is purely speculation, i only added my two cents to the picture since everyone seems fixated on the sure grip name, it was the "oh my they stole it" or the "oh my its rotos name"  I am just pointing out that there very well could be explanations on the usage

Mav you are right there is pending registrations, (an item i did not give thought to) so who really knows what is going on here
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Logged

triggerman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3352
Re: The Buzzbomb
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2008, 09:14:35 AM »
quote:
Its HIGHLY unlikely a company would loan or clear a trademark or its likeness to a market competitor, its just not a smart business practice.


but to sell the usage of a trademarked name is and can be good business sense if the price is right  I never said it was loaned, once again my thoughts are purely speculation so dont take them for anything more then that
--------------------
www.bowlingballexchange.com

Triggerman

F.O.S Loud, F.O.S. Proud

Lane #1 Baby

Logged

MegaMav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: The Buzzbomb
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2008, 09:18:52 AM »
understood, just trying to educate before this becomes a firestorm.
Logged

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: The Buzzbomb
« Reply #34 on: January 03, 2008, 10:31:33 AM »
quote:
I'm leaning more in that direction than "back door deals", I'm not into that sorta thing, but apparently you Lane #1 guys are.


LOL! Mav, you're harboring some serious mental baggage....

Regardless of what you think of 'Lane #1 guys' or Lane#1 itself, the company has successfully been in business for a long time. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that they thought about the name and have done what's legally necessary to use it. If something fell through the cracks, they're smart enough to change the name and move on.

The more relevant question is what the new coverstock brings to the table. If they have something that can to go toe-to-toe with the Resurgence, they'll have a winner.
--------------------
"Sometimes, the best move is the one we don't make"
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »