Post by: BulldogsFan89 on November 14, 2005, 12:31:01 PM
Post by: Brickguy221 on November 14, 2005, 08:44:25 PM
--------------------
Brick
Post by: BulldogsFan89 on November 14, 2005, 09:06:34 PM
Why should I pick the Tsunami over the Reactive?
Post by: icetink on November 14, 2005, 09:15:54 PM
I don't know much about Lane1 products, but because the Tsunami is highly polished, that would mean it'll handle lesser oil than the Arsenal Reactive, and it'll have more backend than the Arsenal Reactive.
I guess it depends on your needs and wants. The Arsenal Reactive would be closer to the GP2 in terms of reaction and oil handling capabilities, and the Tsunami would be closer to the Triple X in terns of reaction and oil handle capabilities. Whichever ball you choose, you can always play with the surface to get a desired reaction!
--------------------
Dino
Evolutionary. Revolutionary.
Track
Post by: charlest on November 15, 2005, 05:25:28 AM
--------------------
Bowling: Wish I could help me as much as I seem to help others ...
Life ... is what you make of it. No, really!
Post by: Jeffrevs on November 15, 2005, 06:58:45 AM
quote:
The Triple X being a pretty strong ball for a resin pearl is likely to overlap with the Tsunami H2O a little too much, unless you haze or slightly rough up the surface. The Arsenal Reactive being very strong for a resin half-solid/half pearl (on the order of the Absolute Inferno) is likely to fit, in box condition between the GP2 and the Triple X better. It'll handle more oil thna the Triple X, but less than the GP2. It'll go longer than the GP2 but grab the lanes earlier than the Triple X.
--------------------
Bowling: Wish I could help me as much as I seem to help others ...
Life ... is what you make of it. No, really!
Ahhhh......smell the fresh air of reason !!?? Thanks charlest...I agree!
--------------------
JEFF
"...each anothers audience outside the gilded cage.."
Post by: chitown on November 23, 2005, 03:23:58 PM
quote:
prettier colours? lol!
I don't know much about Lane1 products, but because the Tsunami is highly polished, that would mean it'll handle lesser oil than the Arsenal Reactive, and it'll have more backend than the Arsenal Reactive.
I guess it depends on your needs and wants. The Arsenal Reactive would be closer to the GP2 in terms of reaction and oil handling capabilities, and the Tsunami would be closer to the Triple X in terns of reaction and oil handle capabilities. Whichever ball you choose, you can always play with the surface to get a desired reaction!
--------------------
Dino
Evolutionary. Revolutionary.
Track
I disagree with the fact that the tsunami has more backend. I own an arsenal reactive and it's polished with magic shine it has one of the biggest backends of any ball I have ever seen. I seen the Tsunami in league and it does have a big backend but not anymore the the reactive.
I feel the tsunami is more versatile than the AR because the AR is so strong that it can only be used on med and up. The Tsunami from what BTM says can handle light oil as well as heavy but works best on med.
Edited on 11/23/2005 4:17 PM