BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Lane #1 => Topic started by: Blows on December 09, 2007, 01:43:04 PM

Title: usbc legal
Post by: Blows on December 09, 2007, 01:43:04 PM
Are the lane1 balls legal for usbc leagues? Why i ask none of the leagues i bowled on i have never saw anything using any of these balls
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: Nails on December 09, 2007, 09:46:55 PM
Yes, perfectly legal.
--------------------
Telling it like it is.
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: Joe Jr on December 09, 2007, 09:56:18 PM
hehe
--------------------
My Vid (http://"http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e56/RevLefty/?action=view¤t=Mystic.flv")
Formerly Brunswick Lefty & Richard Cranium

Quote from Conspirator300:
And yeah, I do know it all.. I don't spend 30+ hours a week learning more about bowling for my heatlh... I do it so I know more than all of you.. which I do. (besides the random few that are staffers/work in the bowling business.. which that population is decreasing little by little)
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: Blows on December 09, 2007, 09:58:39 PM
ok,I was not sure as i said i have never saw anyone use these balls,Best ball for heavy oil? that rolls early and doesn't snap hard at the backend?I do not like long and snap balls
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: charlest on December 09, 2007, 10:22:47 PM
If anyone has any doubts or problems, like league secretaries or presidents, (who, by the way, should know exactly where to look) point them towards this USBC web page:

http://www.bowl.com/downloads/pdf/approved_balllist.pdf

Also tell them to see the rule book, chapter 7, "USBC Equipment SPecifications", as it says on the first page.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unoffical Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: sawdust on December 09, 2007, 11:18:48 PM
Well Blows I would look for a super carbide bomb its a big hooking ball that breaks at about half the lane.  But the only problem is it is a retired ball but you can find used ones and on occasion a nib if you want to fork out the cash.  Hope this helps
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: Grayson on December 10, 2007, 12:31:57 AM
and the newer balls have the "stamp" on them
--------------------
"Have fun and bowl well!" - Grayson
"Some things are made so even idiots won't fail using them.... But I aks what about the genius?" - Grayson

(\ /)
(x_x)
c.(')(')
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: novawagonmaster on December 10, 2007, 06:10:42 AM
quote:
Best ball for heavy oil? that rolls early and doesn't snap hard at the backend?I do not like long and snap balls



Uranium solid.
Drilled pin even with or below fingers, CG out, or drill it CG Axis if you dont mind a whopper of an X-hole. I drilled one of mine CG Axis (pin ended up even with fingers, just right of ring, 3.75" from PAP. It rolls early, and is a very smooth arc to the pocket...no snap. If you are going to do this, try to find one with low top weight.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user...see profile.
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: shelley on December 10, 2007, 06:18:22 AM
You have to work to find a ball from one of the major American ball manufacturers that is not USBC legal.  It's easier to check the Non-conforming (http://"http://www.bowl.com/specs/ballNonconforming.aspx") list than the approved list.  The manufacturers don't want to put out a ball that's not approved; the overwhelming majority of people who are going to drop $150-250 on a bowling ball are bowling in USBC-sanctioned leagues and tournaments.

SH
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: T-GOD on December 10, 2007, 08:29:16 AM
If you can find a Super Carbide Bomb, that is the best ball ever made for heavy oil. A Solid Uranium is another good choice as well as the G-Force drilled CG Axis. =:^D
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: Dan Belcher on December 10, 2007, 08:37:00 AM
quote:
You have to work to find a ball from one of the major American ball manufacturers that is not USBC legal.  It's easier to check the Non-conforming (http://"http://www.bowl.com/specs/ballNonconforming.aspx") list than the approved list.  The manufacturers don't want to put out a ball that's not approved; the overwhelming majority of people who are going to drop $150-250 on a bowling ball are bowling in USBC-sanctioned leagues and tournaments.

SH
On a related tangent, why are those balls on the list not USBC approved?
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: shelley on December 10, 2007, 08:52:17 AM
quote:
On a related tangent, why are those balls on the list not USBC approved?


I don't know about all of them but I do know some.  The Michael Jordan ball is not approved because those little lines that make it look like a basketball are actually grooves in the cover.  Can't have that.

The webbing on the Web ball is not an image on the surface like a Viz-a-ball.  Each color is actually separate pieces of plastic.  The yellow is just yellow plastic molded into grooves in the black cover.  Has a tendency to chip and flake apart.

The Whiskey Bottles from Lanehawk is not approved because (I think) there is actually liquid inside the bottles.  If not, then it's the metal bottle caps.  Can't have actual metal in the ball.

The Bonanza IIs are non-conforming probably because there's no telling what the thing actually is.  Columbia would basically have to have each color approved separately since each color is a different core/cover combination.  Just not worth it for what's basically a blem.

The Ebonite Quasar is non-conforming because of the battery and lights inside it.  Again, can't have metals or electronics in the ball.

The others, I don't know.  I've seen the Via Planet X balls in the Kmart here, I would never have guessed that they are non-conforming.  They're not hard to find, and most non-approved balls are pretty rare.

I've seen a Web on the TV show, something from the late '90s or early 2000s.  Don't remember if it was ever thrown but it was on the ball return.  I think PB3 had one.

SH
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: WSUstroker on December 10, 2007, 09:04:29 AM
Shelley, you bring up an interesting point.  Metal is not allowed to be used in a core, correct?  What about old C300 balls with Titanium?  Titanium is indeed a metal by all definitions yet these balls are legal.
--------------------
Dan Chambers
www.absolutebowling.com
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: Grayson on December 10, 2007, 03:03:18 PM
just speculation:
USBC changes rules now and then...

I guess when a ball is approved it is approved now matter what the rules say later... dunno...


--------------------
"Have fun and bowl well!" - Grayson
"Some things are made so even idiots won't fail using them.... But I aks what about the genius?" - Grayson

(\ /)
(x_x)
c.(')(')
Title: Re: usbc legal
Post by: J_Mac on December 10, 2007, 06:28:34 PM
quote:
Shelley, you bring up an interesting point.  Metal is not allowed to be used in a core, correct?  What about old C300 balls with Titanium?  Titanium is indeed a metal by all definitions yet these balls are legal.
--------------------
Dan Chambers
www.absolutebowling.com


It's not true titanium as far as I know.  It's an undrillable titanium based ceramic nugget I believe.
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice."  Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."