charlest: Thanks for doing some research, but "Drilling a Cranberry" is not the thread. The topic I was referring to was specifically targeted to the absence of Cranberry reviews.
Before continuing, I want to emphasize that I'm not a Lane#1 basher. The XXXL was my first Buzzsaw, and I'm very pleased. While I don't own a SCB, I've recommended the ball to several folks and I should get the commission for 3 sales.
However, the Cranberry is a simply a terrible core to cover match, and I believe that's why you see so few reviews. Bowlers hate to admit they made a mistake, so most will remain silent before admitting they bought a turd. A ball with a good core-to-cover match should be useful on some range of conditions regardless of drill pattern. That's the ultimate test for any ball. When we get into exotic discussions that conclude a ball can be drilled with only a few patterns to be useful, you can't help but sniff trouble.
Anyway, the point of my post was not to further analyze the Cranberry, but to ask why the topic was gone. Again, if there is an unwritten rule that only good things can be said about Lane#1 equipment, the folks responsible should be up front and say it.
--------------------
"You want the truth? -- You can't handle the truth! "Edited on 1/2/2004 4:30 PM