BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Lane #1 => Topic started by: monstercrank on March 26, 2006, 04:06:00 AM

Title: what would be stronger
Post by: monstercrank on March 26, 2006, 04:06:00 AM
pin under ring cg kicked or pin under ring stacked. also what would be the strongest possible layout for an enriched for a high tracker.
--------------------
Go MaxBob, Chris Barnes, Tommy Jones, Patric Allen, and Jason Couch!!!!!
--------------------------------------------
bowling is my way of telling pins some times they just need to lay the fu*k down
------------------------------------
ancient chineese proverb:
"I'm not as think as you drunk I am"
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: monstercrank on March 28, 2006, 01:53:01 PM
anyone?
--------------------
Go MaxBob, Chris Barnes, Tommy Jones, Patric Allen, and Jason Couch!!!!!
--------------------------------------------
bowling is my way of telling pins some times they just need to lay the fu*k down
------------------------------------
ancient chineese proverb:
"I'm not as think as you drunk I am"
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Roy Munson on March 28, 2006, 01:57:36 PM
I would guess it would be cg kicked out since it is more unstable rotation, but I'm not a driller.
--------------------

I Saw You !
-Noel
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: scottie on March 28, 2006, 02:50:48 PM
cg out would be a more continious arc, stacked would give you a stronger backend and more length
--------------------
Scottish by birth, British by law, Highlander by the grace of God!
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Roy Munson on March 28, 2006, 04:36:42 PM
Strongest in what way? total overall hook or backend hook. . .
--------------------

I Saw You !
-Noel
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: scottie on March 28, 2006, 04:47:35 PM
more backend hook
--------------------
Scottish by birth, British by law, Highlander by the grace of God!
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Roy Munson on March 28, 2006, 05:14:12 PM
hey as$wipe,

  "I hate people who give advice thats wrong."

  read again - guess and not a driller
--------------------

I Saw You !
-Noel
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: monstercrank on March 28, 2006, 06:06:35 PM
by strongest I mean overall hook. and how does cg not matter if the ball is symetrical, do you mean if I drilled it pin down and cg over the fingers the only difference it would make is were the x hole goes? that dosent sound right to me, but I am not a driller.
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Roy Munson on March 28, 2006, 07:21:55 PM
apologies accepted!
--------------------

I Saw You !
-Noel
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Carolina Kingpin on March 28, 2006, 07:30:29 PM
Delete,
Actually, the placement of the cg matters more on a symmetrical ball than it does on an asymmetrical ball. On a symmetrical ball, the cg affects where the second preferred spin axis is located, unlike on asym's, where the second PSA is determined primarily by the core.

Also, the ratio of the topweight to the weight of the ball is not a very useful way to characterize the potential effect of the cg. What matters is how much leverage is produced by the cg. Leverage is a function of the mass on the end of the lever--the topweight--and the length of the lever. One ounce on a 15lb. ball with a low average rg will have more of an effect than one ounce on a high rg ball. So, it matters how the 15lbs. are distributed relative to the center of the ball.

From the Ebonite website:

"The minimal effects of static weights stem from their limited leverage. One ounce of static weight equals 1/64th of an inch from the geometric center of the ball. The furthest that the center of gravity can be from the center of the ball at maximum ABC limits is 3/64th of an inch.

Now compare this to the radius of gyration limits. On the low side of ABC limits is 2.43. This means that the mass displacement is 2.43 inches from the geometric center of the ball. The upper limit is 2.80 inches. Sounds to me like a bigger lever arm compared to 3/64th of an inch. You can alter your ball motion much greater by changing RG's than static weights."

Notice that the word "minimal" is used--not zero.

To answer the original question, the effect (though small) of swinging the cg counter-clockwise from the pin, all else equal, is to make the ball rev sooner/ use its energy faster. A common way of describing the effect is to increase midlane read. Whether or not this results in more overall hook depends on the lane condition. If the pattern is long, for example, earlier revs could increase hook by keeping the ball from sliding past the breakpoint. On the other hand, if the pattern is short, then earlier revs could cause the ball to burn up, decreasing hook.

In any case, the effect of the cg is minimal and not nearly as important as placement of the pin.

CK
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Carolina Kingpin on March 28, 2006, 07:54:48 PM
You're right. I don't watch videos of robots throwing bowling balls. There are better videos to watch on the internet.

Edited on 3/28/2006 8:55 PM
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: MegaMav on March 28, 2006, 09:05:25 PM
enough about CG, we're not getting into it again.

and for everyone that wants to see the brunswick video who hasnt...
here it is...

http://www.brunswickbowling.com/uploads/vids/CG_demo_5-05.wmv

Eric
--------------------
USBC Certified Bowler
Average: 211

See Profile For Arsenal Details
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: monstercrank on March 29, 2006, 09:46:42 AM
so what would the absolute strongest pin position be for total board coverage?
--------------------
Go MaxBob, Chris Barnes, Tommy Jones, Patric Allen, and Jason Couch!!!!!
--------------------------------------------
bowling is my way of telling pins some times they just need to lay the fu*k down
------------------------------------
ancient chineese proverb:
"I'm not as think as you drunk I am"
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: Cranking_Inferno on March 29, 2006, 10:26:25 AM
CG kicked out will cause more side weight and an earlier roll... stacked is still a strong drill, its just that kicking the the cg out to the right further will allow the ball to set up earlier and have more of a strong arc reaction vs, a stacked reaction which would be slightly less, but more of a full jerk on the back end.
--------------------
Arsenal:

EPX-T1 - Flooded oil
Action - Heavy oil
Inferno - Heavy to Medium oil
Action Packed - Medium oil
Smoking Inferno - Medium to dry
Blue Dot - Spare ball
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: scottie on March 29, 2006, 10:40:33 AM
thx inferno-if that twat re read what i was saying , he would see its similar to your comments..cg will create roll and arc, stack more length and backend pop
--------------------
Scottish by birth, British by law, Highlander by the grace of God!
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: monstercrank on March 29, 2006, 06:16:45 PM
wow, I just watched the vid, very interesting.
--------------------
Go MaxBob, Chris Barnes, Tommy Jones, Patric Allen, and Jason Couch!!!!!
--------------------------------------------
bowling is my way of telling pins some times they just need to lay the fu*k down
------------------------------------
ancient chineese proverb:
"I'm not as think as you drunk I am"
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: GTX on March 29, 2006, 08:50:54 PM
don't wait long .. cause you surely sound that you don't know much

give me a clean backend with an outside dry boards ( like the brunswick video ) and these CG-in, CG-stacked and CG-out will look the same

a true test would be on variety of lane conditions and that were the difference would show

I totally agree with what some said, CG kicked out will cause an early roll + even arc where stacked will give more length and stronger arc / flip at the end.

and i don't need to watch a video to know all that ..

very funny when a friend of mine had the Solid Uranium drilled 1:30 label, the ball was dead for him .. I told him to plug it and go with stacked drilling and the ball is rolling totally different ... I guess yeah, CG position did not make a difference at all.

P.S. I wonder why the Big B used "one" "unknown" ball with few frames in their video ... why not use some of the latest balls and different lanes conditions
--------------------
Member of F.O.S.

Super Carbide Bomb (x3)
Solid Uranium (x2)
Hybrid Dirty Bomb
Uranium
H2O
Tsunami
Black Cherry Bomb
Enriched Uranium x2
Dirty Bomb

BOMB SQUAD ... Searching for pins to destroy
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: GTX on March 30, 2006, 02:49:58 AM
I knew you will be stupid enough to think because of that one example I mentioned, is why I say both drills will give different reactions

I owe you an apology, I thought you were smart enough since you started math and physics ... but I was wrong

my one example was the "contradiction" of your theory "if you have one actually" ... and I am not gonna waste my time to explain what is "contradiction" to you

so what's next, 1" pin is the same as 4" pin  lol
--------------------
Member of F.O.S.

Super Carbide Bomb (x3)
Solid Uranium (x2)
Hybrid Dirty Bomb
Uranium
H2O
Tsunami
Black Cherry Bomb
Enriched Uranium x2
Dirty Bomb

BOMB SQUAD ... Searching for pins to destroy
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: charlest on March 30, 2006, 04:35:01 AM
stop deleting me wrote:
quote:

2 words: Brunswick throwbot.


If you remember the Brunswick Throbot was also used in the late 1990s to prove that mass bias/PSA cored balls did not provide any difference from non-mass bias/symmetric cores. Now, guess what? Brunswick uses PSA/mass bias balls.

Do we see a pattern here?
Sounds like the numbers game: they can show anything you want to show, whether it's true or not.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
(That includes me too, at times! )

Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: monstercrank on March 30, 2006, 04:48:03 AM
WOW, looks like I brought up a good topic. too bad it probably dosent belong in this section anymore.
--------------------
Go MaxBob, Chris Barnes, Tommy Jones, Patric Allen, and Jason Couch!!!!!
--------------------------------------------
bowling is my way of telling pins some times they just need to lay the fu*k down
------------------------------------
ancient chineese proverb:
"I'm not as think as you drunk I am"
Title: Re: what would be stronger
Post by: GTX on March 30, 2006, 12:14:08 PM
haha  .. when you think you are the smartest .. you find out the opposite

http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=120509&ForumID=7&CategoryID=2

glad to see some of the points I mentioned, got mentioned there as well

needless to say I have balls drilled with CG-in, stacked and CG-out and I get different reactions

to me, with the above link .. no point to argue something proven pointless
--------------------
Member of F.O.S.

Super Carbide Bomb (x3)
Solid Uranium (x2)
Hybrid Dirty Bomb
Uranium
H2O
Tsunami
Black Cherry Bomb
Enriched Uranium x2
Dirty Bomb

BOMB SQUAD ... Searching for pins to destroy