Author Topic: Question (Read 2110 times)

Gazoo · « **on:** June 22, 2006, 01:01:56 AM »

Not very familiar with this company. Are there any longevity issues since most of their covers are particle. Just curious.

shelley · « **Reply #1 on:** June 22, 2006, 09:34:49 AM »

Their Diamond particle covers are supposed to be among the longest lasting particle covers around.

SH

mini kahuna · « **Reply #2 on:** June 22, 2006, 09:35:23 AM »

I have had a masterpiece(reactive,no particles)for over a year over 100 games no track no loss of reaction,a friend of mine has a yeah baby(heavy particle)with over 200 games on it ball hasn't lost any reaction at all.ball doesn't even have a track in it,all he has done is clean it with lanemasters cleaner.
if you are sick of $200 balls that last 50 games and die give legends/lansmasters a try.

shelley · « **Reply #3 on:** June 22, 2006, 09:44:33 AM »

quote:
Yeah normal particle balls, the particles are made out of glass beads but their partilces are made out of diamond, the strongers element that you can basically use.

Long-lasting that they may be, they aren't actually made out of diamond. Were the particles actual diamond, they would fail the new hardness requirements from the USBC. This was brought up when the rule was being discussed (but tended to get swamped by the CG-in-palm rule discussion).

SH

charlest · « **Reply #4 on:** June 22, 2006, 10:52:53 AM »

quote:
quote:
Yeah normal particle balls, the particles are made out of glass beads but their partilces are made out of diamond, the strongers element that you can basically use.

Long-lasting that they may be, they aren't actually made out of diamond. Were the particles actual diamond, they would fail the new hardness requirements from the USBC. This was brought up when the rule was being discussed (but tended to get swamped by the CG-in-palm rule discussion).

SH

Their particles are supposed to be industrial diamond dust.

USBC test? Anything passes that they want to pass. Get real!
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

shelley · « **Reply #5 on:** June 22, 2006, 10:57:53 AM »

quote:
USBC test? Anything passes that they want to pass. Get real!

I think that would only apply if the ball were called The 900 or the Mushtare.

SH

Bowljr300 · « **Reply #6 on:** June 24, 2006, 08:34:03 PM »

I have not had any longevity issues with L/LM balls. This really is a fine manufacturer. I also like the fact that their coverstocks don't rely upon oil absorption for hook as much as other manufacturers; this keeps the hook more consistent for a longer period of time.

charlest · « **Reply #7 on:** June 24, 2006, 09:20:47 PM »

quote:
quote:
USBC test? Anything passes that they want to pass. Get real!

I think that would only apply if the ball were called The 900 or the Mushtare.

SH

Well, that could have been a bad day ...
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Brickguy221 · « **Reply #8 on:** June 25, 2006, 01:26:51 AM »

I've seen a dying problem where I bowl with one Yeah Baby and two New Standards plus a third New Standard had a chunk about the size of a baseball shatter and leave pieces on the lane and a hole in the ball. However, L/LM did replace this ball. But then again, I've seen dying balls in other manufacturers balls also, so I don't think you need to be concerned about L/LM balls not lasting as I am sure they will last as long as their competitors balls.
--------------------
Brick

Edited on 6/25/2006 10:29 AM

Author Topic: Question (Read 2110 times)

Gazoo

Question

shelley

Re: Question

mini kahuna

Re: Question

shelley

Re: Question

charlest

Re: Question

shelley

Re: Question

Bowljr300

Re: Question

charlest

Re: Question

Brickguy221

Re: Question