win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Diamond Particle Pearl  (Read 11524 times)

Zanatos1914

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2376
  • Success is achieved by failure
Diamond Particle Pearl
« on: October 01, 2013, 10:03:33 AM »
Does anybody have anything on this ball...

I cant even find nothing on the web besides maybe a few pictures and ball specs...

Did this company go out of business...

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2013, 11:04:11 AM »
Lane Masters was bought up by another company and is now producing balls again. Since you posted in this forum, just go look into the previous posts for the past 2 - 4 months to see what's been happening.

This is their current web site: http://www.lane-masters.com/

I do not know if LM is again using diamond dust as the particles in their current lineup but they are making particle balls.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Zanatos1914

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2376
  • Success is achieved by failure
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2013, 12:54:38 PM »
Searched the site and web and cant find anything on the ball - Thanks

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2013, 03:38:50 PM »
Searched the site and web and cant find anything on the ball - Thanks


The "Red Diamond" is a particle pearl.
I suspect there is no ball called the "Diamond Particle Pearl",  for reasons sited above, but anything is possible.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

dougb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2013, 07:08:48 PM »
Additionally, there was a Black Diamond (particle ball but not a pearl) and a Black Pearl (particle pearl, but no "diamond" in the name).

BradleyInIrving

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2013, 09:59:34 PM »
the 1st New Standard had it and New Standard 2 i believe had it.. that was years ago and a lot has changed since then :)

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2013, 06:47:35 AM »
the 1st New Standard had it and New Standard 2 i believe had it.. that was years ago and a lot has changed since then :)


Yup, a whole bunch of the original Legends by LaneMasters balls had them (Yeah Baby!, Big Kahuna, Black Diamond, Black Pearl, etc.), but I believe he's looking for a brand new ball by that SPECIFIC name. I have not heard of it from the NEW Lane Masters company.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Zanatos1914

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2376
  • Success is achieved by failure
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2013, 04:30:00 PM »
Found this link finally...

This is what I was looking for....

http://www.bowlingballvault.com/companies/15-lane-masters/254-new-standard#jr_reviewUserSummaryMainTitle

This is my ball I bought for $20

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2013, 07:02:57 PM »
Found this link finally...

This is what I was looking for....

http://www.bowlingballvault.com/companies/15-lane-masters/254-new-standard#jr_reviewUserSummaryMainTitle

This is my ball I bought for $20

That's the original New Standard, the ball that put Lane Masters "on the map". It came out in 2006. It used diamond dust as the particles in the coverstock. "Diamond Particle" was the coverstock name, not the ball name. No wonder you had us all going around in circles.  It was a solid/pearl combo, not a pearl.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

batbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2013, 10:08:08 PM »
The Yeah Baby had the Diamond Particle high load and I loved that ball, had two of them. Legends/Lane Masters had to make a change with the diamond particles because of the hardness and keeping USBC happy. Just my $.02, Bruce
Bruce Campbell
Coaches aren't born, they are made!
USBC Silver Certified Coach
          
www.rotogrip.com
www.stormbowling.com
www.radicalbowling.com
www.damngoodbowling.com

Changing bowling, one bowler at a time!

Shaggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2013, 08:26:53 AM »
The Yeah Baby and New Standard 2 need medium to heavy oil on the lanes unless you have high ball speed.  The New Standard and Big Kahuna are better suited for medium oil. The Diamond particle coverstock is one of the most durable I have used...rolled hundreds of games with mine and still have the same good ball reaction with very little wear on the coverstock.
You will not see me on the PBA Tour, but I love the game!!!

Zanatos1914

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2376
  • Success is achieved by failure
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2013, 05:03:57 PM »
Last and final question...

I have only thrown this ball maybe twice....

It seems to respond like the Cuda C with it reaction but just alittle more agressive...
Not good on ball specs but the drilling look about the same and the reactions seem to be about the same...  Read the information on the ball and it said the ball would skid down the lane on oil and then once it hits the dry it will spin up...  That is about the same as the Cuda C...

Really thanks for all the help...
Maybe I just need to get on the lanes and test but Oil is hard the find these days in my area..
Probably will use it tonight - Hard rumors about fluilding the lanes for once this season..

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2013, 07:30:12 PM »
Zanatos,

There's 10 years difference in design and the Cuda is plain resin while the New Standard is particle. Words used to describe each do not show the difference between them. No way on heaven and earth do they react the same. Due to house oil patterns & lane surfaces, drillings, bowler's release and delivery, amount of use and many other factors, they may appear similar under certain circumstances. I have had a Cuda and A Super Cuda and still have my New Standard. At a bare minimum, the NS handles a whole lot more oil than a Cuda could.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

BossTull

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2013, 07:19:51 AM »
Found this link finally...

This is what I was looking for....

http://www.bowlingballvault.com/companies/15-lane-masters/254-new-standard#jr_reviewUserSummaryMainTitle

This is my ball I bought for $20

Jbungard.s "Still Relevant After All These Years" review on the NS is on the mark. I still use my New Standard first out of bag. I find as a Stroker ball works best with surface 800 grit gray pad no polish. A good medium to medium heavy oil ball.


Link to original flyer
http://lanemasters.net/marketing/Balls/Retired%20Balls/Legends_NewStandard/Leg_NS_BK_Flyer.pdf

"Let me bowl or let me die!"

BossTull

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Diamond Particle Pearl
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2013, 10:04:35 AM »
The Yeah Baby had the Diamond Particle high load and I loved that ball, had two of them. Legends/Lane Masters had to make a change with the diamond particles because of the hardness and keeping USBC happy. Just my $.02, Bruce

Just curious about a change with diamond particles and the hardness. I thought as long as the hardness was greater than 72 it would be accepted. NS and YB is 72-74. Why would USBC prohibit L/M from using DPs in their coverstock?

I was kind of hoping the NEW L/M would bring back a ball with a  DIAMOND PARTICLE cover.
"Let me bowl or let me die!"