BigHorn,
I had the WC, 2 of them, in fact. I now have the WCR. I think it is the "partner" to the WC, not the WCPP. I think it could be made into the partner, with the right drill and the right surface,depending on how you drilled the WC AND on your release/delivery. Drilled the same, there might be too much overlap to be complements. I say, "MIGHT". A lot depends on the oil pattern you see, and your release. That's a fairly strong drilling.
I see you say you can "cover the heavier side of medium all the way down to dry with these to pieces.". If your WC particle only covers the heavier side of medium and not all the way to true medium, then the WCPP should cover down to maybe medium-light oil, but I'd have a hard time believing it can be used on true dry. Not sure if you can drill the WCPP weak enough to cover dry.
I suspect you have either a high ball speed or a low rev rate. Odd, your profile indicate neither. Rev Rate of 275 - 300, ball speed 15 - 17.
You should be able to cover a lot more oil than heavy medium with the WC??
Maybe our definitons of medium and dry are different ...
zone,
Based on reviews and people's comments here, I drilled my WCR not quite Rico, but in a similar fashion to soften the basic skid/flip tendency of that ball. SO far, it worked and it is definitely not skid/flip and does handle some carrydown with the stock surface. Of course, whether it does or not for a particular bowler, depends on a whole bunch of factors, as per normal
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see." Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ