win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: How strong is the sure strike cover?  (Read 1210 times)

REvans284

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
How strong is the sure strike cover?
« on: April 16, 2008, 04:35:53 PM »
Just how strong is the sure strike cover?  Would it be too strong for burnt heads, and shorter patterns?  Plans are for a long pin-pap distance, and to get in deep... REALLY deep..  Lower speed, higher rev player.  Don't want something weak weak as in core, but want it to get down lane.

Thanks

REvans284


 

revTrex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1354
Re: How strong is the sure strike cover?
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2008, 01:20:08 AM »
The Sure Strike cover responds pretty quickly to friction, so I don't know if "burnt heads" are the ideal lane condition for the ball, no matter how weak you drill it. I'd think a Hornet would be a better choice. The harder, but still reactive, pearl resin should get more natural length and still provide you with enough pop on the back. Given your high rev rate, I don't think you'll have a problem with the Hornet being too mellow.
--------------------
www.900global.com

www.bowlersjournal.com

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: How strong is the sure strike cover?
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2008, 11:10:27 AM »
quote:
quote:
Given your high rev rate, I don't think you'll have a problem with the Hornet being too mellow.



Boy, I sure agree with that. The Hornet is anything but mellow in my experience. A great ball for drier conditions, although at least in my case, it still needs at least a bit of oil.
--------------------
"Love God, laugh more, spend more time with the ones you love, play with children, do good to those in need, and eat more ice cream. There is more to life than bowling."

Scott F. Guinn, USBC Certified Coach



True, it is not a "Mellow" ball, but it will clear dry-ish heads better than any other Lanemasters ball, and better than 99% of the resin balls out there.
The cover is weak but the Buzz/Hornet/Sting core is anything but weak.

My advice is to use a weak drilling if you want to handle the driest lanes that it can. At some point, you'll still need polyester.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

REvans284

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Re: How strong is the sure strike cover?
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2008, 06:19:13 PM »
I'm just looking for something to use on the viper, USBC Masters, and cheetah, after the pattern breaks down a bit in the fronts and I want something that I can get to push a bit through the friction for a second/few feet before it makes its hard turn.  Most of the polished/pearls I have react too quickly to the friction for me and I cant get a comfortable and consistant line with my slower ball speed.

I wanted to drill the ball with the Pin distance higher and away from my PAP to try and delay this, I just dont want a ball with a turd core to do it with (I want to drill a stronger ball weaker, rather than a weaker ball strong.. I haven't had much success with Scout/R's and such with carry).  

I'm looking at 1-2" above my middle finger probably (4 5/16> / 3/4^ PAP - so roughly 6" Pin distance), with CG positive/right of grip center about 2".  It seems like when I have the pin below my ring on a ball, and then simply raise it above my ring; with my verticle measurement, and shorter horiz. measurement the distance isn't really that far apart (thats why my thought on the drilling seems so extreme).  The total board coverege remains about the same on balls drilled like that(on THS)its just the pin up ball is a little cleaner in the front but the backend reaction is stronger evening out the coverage (with hooking heads, I cant touch the pin up ball, because its response to friction is tooo strong, I want something that can push through that a bit farther).

Thanks,

REvans284

Edited on 4/17/2008 6:20 PM

revTrex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1354
Re: How strong is the sure strike cover?
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2008, 06:25:57 PM »
I'd still definitely say Hornet...in fact, even more so now than before.
--------------------
www.900global.com

www.bowlersjournal.com