Author Topic: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike (Read 1371 times)

Juggernaut · « **on:** May 18, 2008, 01:35:31 PM »

Been using a lot of different stuff from several other companies, but have been wanting to try some of these balls. These two look like they would be a good place to start.

Right now, I am throwing an ebonite gamebreaker, a polished hammer pain, and a visionary blue/green centaur.

Really wondering how the Sure Strike and the Counter Strike would match up against the polished pain and the gamebreaker. The B/G centaur is going to stay as my dry lane ball, so looking at two other balls to go above it.

I was thinking I might be able to replace the gamebreaker with the counter strike and the pain with the sure strike.

Any thoughts?
--------------------
What did you expect, something PROFOUND?

Good transactions list in my profile

My Bowl.com member page

charlest · « **Reply #1 on:** May 18, 2008, 09:53:04 PM »

Some thoughts (not necessarily the bottom line):

- Isn't the Pain a solid resin that normally comes with a stock 2000 grit matte finish for medium-heavy to heavy oil?

If so, under normal conditions, the Sure Strike, which is a polished pearl, wouldn't compare to it at all. One problem is just how polished the Pain is is an unknown, and, two, a polished solid will almost always have much more control in its breakpoint than a polished pearl. So comparisons may be very difficult, to say the least.

- The SS is fairly flippy, even for a pearl, so much so, that, even though it handles medium oil, it goes so long, most people use it for less than medium oil. A friend's was so flippy that he redrilled it with a Rico drilling, which made it a much, MUCH better ball for him.)

- I've only seen the Counter strike a couple of times so take this with a grain of salt: compared to the Gamebreaker, I would suggest that the CS, with the same drill, would be more of a control ball, with less backend compared to the GB. ALso the CS is a 1000 sheen finished, particle pearl, while the GB is a 2000 grit, matte finished, solid resin (with a much lower RG). Might be hard to compare, but more similarities than the SS and the Pain.

- I wonder if something like a World Class Particle pearl (hard to gauge just how strong a polished Pain might be) and a sanded XS Power might better compare to a polished Pain and a Gamebreaker??
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ

Juggernaut · « **Reply #2 on:** May 18, 2008, 10:03:08 PM »

quote:
Some thoughts (not necessarily the bottom line):

- Isn't the Pain a solid resin that normally comes with a stock 2000 grit matte finish for medium-heavy to heavy oil?

If so, under normal conditions, the Sure Strike, which is a polished pearl, wouldn't compare to it at all. One problem is just how polished the Pain is is an unknown, and, two, a polished solid will almost always have much more control in its breakpoint than a polished pearl. So comparisons may be very difficult, to say the least.

- The SS is fairly flippy, even for a pearl, so much so, that, even though it handles medium oil, it goes so long, most people use it for less than medium oil. A friend's was so flippy that he redrilled it with a Rico drilling, which made it a much, MUCH better ball for him.)

- I've only seen the Counter strike a couple of times so take this with a grain of salt: compared to the Gamebreaker, I would suggest that the CS, with the same drill, would be more of a control ball, with less backend compared to the GB. ALso the CS is a 1000 sheen finished, particle pearl, while the GB is a 2000 grit, matte finished, solid resin (with a much lower RG). Might be hard to compare, but more similarities than the SS and the Pain.

- I wonder if something like a World Class Particle pearl (hard to gauge just how strong a polished Pain might be) and a sanded XS Power might better compare to a polished Pain and a Gamebreaker??
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ

So,
What you're saying is that the CS is weaker than an OOB gamebreaker and the SS is DEFINITELY weaker than a polished pain, correct?

That might be alright, because I don't think I'll be getting rid of these anytime soon, unless something comes along that DOES replace them.

If I understand what you have just told me, it would go something like this:
1. Gamebreaker
2. CS
3. polished pain
4. SS
5. B/G centaur
--------------------
What did you expect, something PROFOUND?

Good transactions list in my profile

My Bowl.com member page

John D Davis · « **Reply #3 on:** May 18, 2008, 10:06:32 PM »

The Sure Strike is so strange that on the driest conditions, it could be to much of a sharp immediate hook off the dry. A weaker drill such as the Rico as stated above would be a very wise move if you have your mind set on this ball. Its just simply a hit or miss type look to some people. John

charlest · « **Reply #4 on:** May 18, 2008, 10:41:22 PM »

quote:
So,
What you're saying is that the CS is weaker than an OOB gamebreaker and the SS is DEFINITELY weaker than a polished pain, correct?

The SS is probably weaker than a polsihed Pain.
The CS is NOT weaker than a GB in that it can probably handle a similar amount of oil, but it won't have as much backend, which is the CONTROL part.

quote:

That might be alright, because I don't think I'll be getting rid of these anytime soon, unless something comes along that DOES replace them.

If I understand what you have just told me, it would go something like this:
1. Gamebreaker
2. CS
3. polished pain
4. SS
5. B/G centaur
--------------------
What did you expect, something PROFOUND?

Good transactions list in my profile

My Bowl.com member page

Maybe more

1A. Gamebreaker
1B. CS
2. polished pain
3. SS
4. B/G centaur

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ

Juggernaut · « **Reply #5 on:** May 18, 2008, 11:06:17 PM »

quote:

1A. Gamebreaker
1B. CS
2. polished pain
3. SS
4. B/G centaur

I could go for that. Might drill the SS with a shorter pin to pap, say 2 x 4, to help even out some of the over/under of the SS and make it more even rolling.
--------------------
What did you expect, something PROFOUND?

Good transactions list in my profile

My Bowl.com member page

Foppe · « **Reply #6 on:** May 19, 2008, 06:00:03 AM »

I can only comment for the SS here, but let me say: it's a ball that I absolutely love.
We have 2 main patterns in our alley:
1) Somewhat modified THS,38 ft, med-med heavy
2) 38 ft med-light THS

I have mine drilled Stacked Leverage and it absolutely kills the 2nd pattern.
But from the moment the heads start to dry up, I will get some O/U and need to move deeper or make a ball switch.

On fresh: sure it is Skid/Flippy but still very good to control.

For the med, to med-heavy pattern: I can use it, but I need to play the outside & straight up the boards (8 board or further left,since I'm a lefty

), like Charlest said: it goes so long that it doens't handle medium perfect (entry angle to the pocket not as it should be). It can and will still handle & score on medium oil, but you (at least I) won't be able to move in deep, since this ball on a flooded middle wil skid to much.

Edited on 5/19/2008 6:02 AM

Author Topic: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike (Read 1371 times)

Juggernaut

Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike

charlest

Re: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike

Juggernaut

Re: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike

John D Davis

Re: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike

charlest

Re: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike

Juggernaut

Re: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike

Foppe

Re: Would like some info/input on the Sure Strike and the Counter Srike