win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Lord Field Off The Chain  (Read 7958 times)

tmoore300

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Lord Field Off The Chain
« on: July 28, 2013, 01:08:41 PM »
Heres the off the chain http://youtu.be/YAcY0I3LYEE
Logged
Terry Moore

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lord Field Off The Chain
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2013, 05:21:50 PM »
While looking at the specs for the core and the cover of the OTC, I noticed it was extremely close to the Nasty: same light load Proton Particle pearl coverstock and the numbers for the core, OTC: 2.49/.048 vs. Nasty: 2.48/.048 are VERY close, with even the general shape of the core being very similar. The only difference seems to be the surface finish, 1000 grit polished (OTC) vs. 2000 grit dull (Nasty).

So, does anyone, who has an OTC, also have a Nasty?
Are they similar in reaction with the same surface?
(Maybe this should be a different thread?)
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

proform

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: Lord Field Off The Chain
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2013, 05:57:49 PM »
charles,
the cover on the OTC is the cover from the Heritage and not the Nasty. the Nasty is a Proton Particle solid and not a Pearl. The Nasty is a few feet sooner and not angular were as the OTC is cleaner upfront and way more angular down lane. Very similar to the Heritage but the OTC is more angular than the Heritage as well.
Logged
Rod Piasecki
Lord Field Staff
http://www.lordfield.com/

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lord Field Off The Chain
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2013, 09:30:06 PM »
Quote from: proform on August 05, 2013, 05:57:49 PM
charles,
the cover on the OTC is the cover from the Heritage and not the Nasty. the Nasty is a Proton Particle solid and not a Pearl. The Nasty is a few feet sooner and not angular were as the OTC is cleaner upfront and way more angular down lane. Very similar to the Heritage but the OTC is more angular than the Heritage as well.

I only saw "Proton Particle" on their webs sites. So I looked at the BJI review of the Nasty and it said it was pearl. I hadn't drilled my Nasty yet; so I polished it in a small spot.From what I see I can readily believe you're correct. Thank you for the correction.

May I ask you how you learned this?
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

proform

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: Lord Field Off The Chain
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2013, 10:14:41 PM »
Charlest
From a couple Test Drives I have Hosted as well as drilling multiples of each Lord Field Release for myself an Customers. I believe last year When I spoke with Tony Martin during the release of the Nasty and the Ace Mitchell Seminar(August 2012) that Tony had said the Nasty was a Particle Solid(Proton Particle) and the Heritage was a Particle Pearl(Proton Particle). With the OTC Released as the same cover as the Heritage, Proton Particle Pearl but with the weight block from the Jacked. The Nasty is very early and smooth at the break point due to the earlier rollong weight block and solid particle cover stock. My favorites in order have been OTC, Big Hurt, Judgement, Pin Hacker, Heritage, Jacked, Torment, Korrupt, Higgs Force, Exodus Pearl, Exodus Solid, Nasty, Exodus Iron
« Last Edit: August 05, 2013, 10:21:59 PM by proform »
Logged
Rod Piasecki
Lord Field Staff
http://www.lordfield.com/

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lord Field Off The Chain
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2013, 09:00:45 PM »
Thank you.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »