I wonder why today's bowlers seem to be stuck on what I fell is the old standard of 200 equals an elite bowler?
And maybe we are still in the transition period of generations of bowlers where the older bowlers were still young when 200 was the realistic standard back in the 60's-80's.
Or are they basing off the stupid PBA card requirement?
Let's be honest, on today's house conditions, elite is at least 215 in my opinion.
And I understand that it means we no longer can compare generations of bowlers.
But think about it, if you were old enough today to be involved with bowling in the 70's and 80's and you met a bowler, and asked him what he averaged, and he said 205, you'd think he was pretty darned good.
Meet a bowler today, ask him what he averages, and he says 205, I don't know about everyone else, but I think oh, average house hack.
The standard has evolved. Doubt it will ever go back. Adapt to to 215 not 200 and move on.