General Category => Miscellaneous => Topic started by: tvphotog on July 22, 2011, 02:30:31 AM
Title: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: tvphotog on July 22, 2011, 02:30:31 AM
I almost got my first 800 last night and am still looking for my first 300. Since my brother got his 300 last year, my mom is always saying you'll get your 300 someday. I don't think people understand that the 800 is almost better than the 300. I might want the 800 first, but would gladly take either. Any thoughts ?
Mike Thomas Mooresville, NC photog17@windstream.net
Current Arsenal:
Hammer Taboo@ 2000 Storm Dimension @ 2000, pin down Storm Hy-Road @ 4000, shined Columbia Freeze Spare Ball
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: T C 300 on July 22, 2011, 10:38:29 AM
for me its both!!
getn a 300 or 800 is fine and great, but getn both in the same set is a GREAT feat!!!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: marvey23 on July 22, 2011, 10:39:10 AM
Without a doubt I would rather shoot a 800 over a 300 because anyone can catch fire for one game.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: milorafferty on July 22, 2011, 10:46:55 AM
800 of course. I've seen 150 avg bowlers "stumble" into a 300 game and not even shoot 600, but 800 takes more than luck.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: xxrainmakerxx on July 22, 2011, 11:28:28 AM
Hands down 800, no question.
Justin Hanner East Texas Bowler
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: SrKegler on July 22, 2011, 11:37:12 AM
I've got both. I took more pleasure in the 8's than the 3s. However I know how hard the 800 is. Most league bowlers though look at the 300 as perfection. 800s mean you misssed some shots to them. (????)
Two of the houses I used to bowl at in Illinois payed you $300 for a 300, not a penny for an 800 though.
Have Balls - Will Travel
[blue>RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Inverted 1 on July 22, 2011, 11:47:57 AM
I've shot 800 twice in 40+ years of bowling. Much harder than getting a 300..
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: AlBundy33 on July 22, 2011, 11:51:21 AM
I was fortunate enough to shoot my one and only 800 the night I shot my first 300......been waiting over 11 years to shoot another 800. LOL.
"Pretty women make us buy beer, ugly women make us drink beer"
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Juggernaut on July 22, 2011, 12:54:16 PM
The 800, for me, was much harder to get and was more satisfying.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: HarveyIII on July 22, 2011, 01:21:04 PM
800 I find is more of an accomplishment than a 300. I have multiples of both and the 800's have been more gratifying knowing I was able to adjust to the transition of the lanes and conditions.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: kidlost2000 on July 22, 2011, 01:34:13 PM
800 because it is 3 really good games. With a minimum of around 28 strikes to do so of a possible 36 max.
Be good, or be good at it.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: 9andaWiggle on July 22, 2011, 01:49:04 PM
800. Because luck is much less of a factor. Anyone in any given game can get lucky for 12, but luck alone will not get you 28+. Especially those last 10 frames after you do the math in your head from the first 2 games.
9~Internet Tough Guyand Cyberspace Sheep Lover
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Pinbuster on July 22, 2011, 02:24:24 PM
I'm sure it will be overwhelming in favor of the 800.
The 300 has some mystique as it is a "perfect" game.
But the 800 is at a much lower percentage level and I believe most who have done both would say they are prouder of their 800.
I've had a few 800's and I'm still amazed that I happened to carry that well for an entire set. The thought of carrying 36 for a 900 is something I can't comprehend.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Sunshine n Lollipops on July 22, 2011, 03:09:35 PM
The 800 means you really bowled well all three games. Massive figjam alert! I got my 800 the same night I shot my first and second ever 300's back to back. Really should have just hung them up after that. Got my third 300 but the second 800 is elusive.
Don't believe in the Uzi, it just went off in my hand. I, I believe in love.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: THIRTYSIXRED on July 22, 2011, 04:56:46 PM
I remember my 803 series. There is "less pressure" as people have poor memories and don't do the addition of where you are during the night as far as series. There was a very limited number of people who came over to watch. The 2 teams bowling each other know, but most of the league does not readily see it.
A 300 game everyone stops to watch. Never thrown one, but I've seen the people get nervous with everyone stopping to give them lane courtesy. Almost does them more harm then good.
As far as minimum # of strikes for 800...I believe it is 24
9/ X X X X X X X X 9/9 = 268 (Do this 3 games and you have 804)
I am very proud of my 800. Would not trade it for the 300. Will just have to wait a while longer.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Sunshine n Lollipops on July 22, 2011, 05:32:09 PM
You're entitled to your opinion. Unfortunately, your opinion on the 800 is way off base.
Don't believe in the Uzi, it just went off in my hand. I, I believe in love.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: DON DRAPER on July 24, 2011, 05:09:36 PM
Although rolling a 300 game is the ultimate achievement for one game shooting an 800 series for three games is a truer test of how well you are throwing the ball and how well you can continue to CARRY.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Hogsharley on July 24, 2011, 08:17:28 PM
800's are harder to achieve. I would take the 8 over the 3.
3 holes of fun!!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Mighty Buffalo on July 25, 2011, 06:22:34 AM
I would agree with sunshine on this one. Shooting any kind of an 800 is a great accomplishment, and to equate an 800 now to being an 850 to be a real accomplishment is in my opinion garbage. I shot 814 and 826 about 6 months from each other, and each time I had more nerves that last game than I ever had shooting a 300. Basically, take the nerves you have for the tenth frame of a 300 and multiply it times 10 for each frame in the third game.
I like having accomplished both, but for me the 800 is the bigger accomplishment.
Let in the DOGS - I've got a HAMBONE for them!
To all the haters, get over it!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Nodsleinad on July 25, 2011, 06:34:29 AM
800 for sure...it meant and means more to me.....300'd barely gets any reaction now. I personally have 3-4 times more 300 than 800's.
Now the ultimate would be 800 at nationals
Nod
LTBOCSFM
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Inverted 1 on July 25, 2011, 11:38:52 AM
B to B 300 is huge..best I've ever done b to b is 300 - 279..good shooting
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Brickguy221 on July 25, 2011, 02:50:46 PM
"Whenever I feel the urge to exercise I lie down until the feeling passes away."
Brick
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: on July 25, 2011, 03:22:58 PM
I'd rather have 300 - 800 series... Right now I'm settling for 1.
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah Brunswick Pro Shop Staff
www.brunswickbowling.com
The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: On Further Review on July 25, 2011, 04:53:40 PM
I never rolled either a 300 or 800 and now I'm probably too old to ever do it but if I'm ever lucky enough to get one or the other I'd prefer an 800 for reasons that some posters have already said.
If Obamacare is so great why are so many waivers being asked for and given?
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Centers on July 25, 2011, 05:24:28 PM
I remember growing up, I had a couple of friends that all had 300's and I was just dying for one. I was 19, and had 2-298's and shot a 800 before I did the 300. About 8 months later, I finally shot the 300. If you think about it, it is harder to shoot a 300 than it is a 800. You have to be perfect for the 12 frames, where as the 800, you have a slight room for error. Either way you look at it, and everyone does have an opinion, both are great accomplishments. I have 7 300 games, and all of them felt like it was the first time ever shooting them. 800's to me just happends when your on a roll for the night.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: tvphotog on February 02, 2013, 03:30:42 PM
Problem solved, I have both now !!!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: bowler851 on February 02, 2013, 06:13:16 PM
Shot my high series of 851 in 1998, I would say 800 still has merit, 300 has none, I have seen a 166 average bowler who can not even see the pins shoot 300 game (665 series). I also have seen multiple 300 with brooklyn strikes in them, But don't recall a sub 200 bowler shooting 800.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: JPbowling151 on February 02, 2013, 06:33:52 PM
I have yet to shoot either a 300 or an 800 and I can tell you I'd rather much have the glory of an 800 series over a 300...though I wouldn't mind killing two birds with one stone and achieve both. IMO the 800 holds more weight than shooting a 300 these days just because of today's equipment allowing for so many to be shot as oppose to the 70's and 80's where it was more difficult for the average bowler to carry consistently when hitting the pocket with 3-piece urethane, plastic, and rubber.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: batbowler on February 02, 2013, 06:41:24 PM
800 anyday!!! The 800 is three great games and the 300 is one awesome game!! Average 267 for your three games and you have an 801!!! It also equals a lot of strikes!!! lol
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: billy sewell on February 02, 2013, 06:49:39 PM
:) congrats mike on getting both what was your series total?
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: ronsyl on February 02, 2013, 07:11:31 PM
300
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Rightycomplex on February 02, 2013, 07:19:00 PM
800. Shows consistency. I've seen many a hack luck up for 300 (hell I've been the hack to luck up for 300)...... but consistently lucky throughout the night doesnt happen very often. Its harder to shoot 800. I've got 8 total 300's (3 sanctioned), no 800's.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Metal_rules on February 02, 2013, 10:27:08 PM
This is easy for me - I am still looking for my first 800. I am always close 794 -- 793 --789 -- you get the picture -- 2 sanctioned 300's -- but I got to get that 8! IMO the 800 is much harder and will be more sweet when I do get it!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: BrunsMike on February 02, 2013, 10:38:42 PM
I have neither 300 or 800. I would take an 800 series over 300 game any day, in fact when I show up for the night to bowl I hope for a record 3 game average of 267 but I don't think about it.
The closest I came to an 800 was 775. Shot 279, 279, 217. 3rd game got started and had a quick front 4 then 1 wheel fell off. Thought okay I can still do this after a weak 7-10 leave, couldn't recover after that.
No honor scores or 11 in a row to my credit although I do have 11 in a row unsanctioned that was posted on the records board above the bar window from when I shot 290 on the Cheetah pattern during a summer league.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Matt Fortney on February 02, 2013, 11:02:08 PM
800 without a doubt.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: cav on February 03, 2013, 12:12:53 AM
Ill take a 300 with the realization that an 800 is tougher. 300 is epic, you cannot do better....you are perfect.....
Cav
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: BigBaller on February 03, 2013, 01:26:01 AM
I have 3-300's and 1 800. When i shot 800 even last year i had to throw the last 6 in the 3rd game to shoot 8 and i did. 2 weeks before i shot 8 i was talking with Ernie Schlegel in the pro shop and he told me to hang in there someday it will happen and it did. I would take 800 over 300 everyday.
The one thing i have noticed is when i shot my 3's people were standing around watching. When i shot 8 i was the only one keeping track. Nobody even knew. But I did, and that is what mattered to me.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: millertime0299 on February 03, 2013, 09:28:04 AM
300 = perfection. 800 = being darn near perfect. I'll take the 300 but 800 is a close second.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: MrPerfect on February 03, 2013, 10:47:17 AM
Anyone that says 300 should just quit bowling...
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: ikaikastrength on February 03, 2013, 10:58:24 AM
Definitely 800. I've had many more chances at 300 then 800, resulting in 3 300's and 2 800's. My first 800 I needed to shoot a high 280 game and left a 4-7-10 split in the 1st frame, I covered the split and went 10 in a row and shot 801. My second 800 series was 824 with a 297 last game. Funny thing is the house I bowled it at announced over the intercom my 297 game but said nothing about my 800! I even went to the front desk and said I just shot 824 and they looked at me like they didn't know what a 800 was , I couldn't believe it.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: kidlost2000 on February 03, 2013, 12:19:21 PM
800 means more to me then 300. 300 is a great game, and it is nice to have. 300 is the goal at the beginning of every game I bowl. 800 is what matters more. In multiple houses is even better. That to me is the mark of a great bowler. 799 is a scar.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: cav on February 03, 2013, 01:31:11 PM
I think 300......But alas I quit bowling due to this post...farewell.
Cav
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Cornerpin on February 03, 2013, 02:14:11 PM
800, without question. Much harder to achieve.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: LookingForALeftyWall on February 03, 2013, 02:19:53 PM
I think the average league bowler who has never bowled a 300 would rather have the 300. It's easier to brag about a 300 than an 800 to someone who does not bowl. People outside of bowling are really impressed when you tell them you've bowled a 300.
Now, I think as you get further along, and you average higher, I think you get a better understanding of just how hard 800 is. I personally think that 800 is more prestigious and is much harder to accomplishment than a 300. With that said, why would you want one rather than the other when every night you go bowling you should want to shoot both each and everytime?
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: lifted rillo on February 03, 2013, 05:35:22 PM
Since I've been one of the hacks who has gotten lucky enough to carry 12 straight for a 300, I definitely want 800. That will make me much more proud of my bowling.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: On Further Review on February 03, 2013, 05:59:16 PM
800 has to have more value than a 300. You can carry a few Brooklyn hits for a 300 but it isn't likely that you can luck out and get an 800. You have to roll the ball real well for three games for 800.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: tmoore300 on February 03, 2013, 07:09:12 PM
800
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: hallofamer on February 03, 2013, 09:44:03 PM
That's a good question. I'll go against conventional wisdom for better bowlers and say 300 over 800. 300 is a "perfect" game. 800 is sustained good shotmaking and carry, and much less common, but not "perfect". Personally I could have lived without an 800 in my "career", but could have lived without a 300. JMHO.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: batbowler on February 03, 2013, 10:19:05 PM
Anybody can get lucky and shoot 300, but it's harder to get that lucky for an 800! I've seen several people get 300's and not shoot 600 with a lots of brooklyn strikes!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: TDC57 on February 03, 2013, 11:44:45 PM
I once had the opportunity to speak at length with Earl Anthony and he was wearing his 800 ring. I asked him the same question and he was unwavering, 800. He said you have to bowl at a very high level for three games and 300 was great, but you didn't necessarily have to make 12 great shots to get one.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Zanatos1914 on February 04, 2013, 09:41:26 AM
800 -- Hands down...
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Jesse James on February 04, 2013, 10:01:12 AM
800!! All day every day! I have a couple of 300 games, one of which I threw and didn't even know I was throwing it. One I threw on a sport conditon and got extremely lucky to get it. Sometimes 300 games just find you!
An 800 means you are bowling with consistency and reading the lanes correctly as they transition and breakdown. To me, that is huge! I can't tell you how many times I have made third game moves......only to realize after getting tapped twice.....that I didn't make a big enough move, that would have changed that 223 game into a 258 or better game!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: milorafferty on February 04, 2013, 10:18:11 AM
Is it really a question? You can't "get lucky" enough to shoot an 800 series.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: ithinkican on February 04, 2013, 10:52:21 AM
A 300 usually comes before your first 800. you have three chances to get a 300 in each series. you only have ONE shot for an 800. I was 13 when i shot my first 300 but i ended that set with a 691 series. It was not until two years ago at age 19, I shot my first 800. I am 21 now and a 300 is extremely easy to come by especially with the easy house shots and advanced bowling ball technology. The goal for people nowadays should be higher than just a mere 300 or 800. It should be 900.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: BobOhio on February 04, 2013, 11:20:33 AM
800 by far,the more difficult of the two.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: cav on February 04, 2013, 11:22:29 AM
Is this really a question? 300 is perfect, while 800 is not......
Cav
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: littlegreycat on February 04, 2013, 11:43:01 AM
I agree 300 or 800 with the ease of bowling isn't good enough. 800 is and has always been my standard and I nearly got it before the 300. When you get hot a couple 9/ doesn't ruin the 800 but ruins the 300. the 300 rewards pressure the 800 rewards consistency. I've never felt worried getting to an 800. Yet, I do worry every time with the 300. ------ I watched so many high average bowlers play straight somewhere down 5 to gutter. They've tweeked their throw and drillings to play there league or tourney. This seems smart you always play from the weakest oil. I know there are patterns that won't work this way but these guys won't bowl on them. You're saying "What's this got to do with 300 or 800?" Plenty if you can concour one line for all conditions what place stands a chance. Is that not the best way to achive the perfect goal. Whoever thinks I must concour all lines on all conditons with my limitless arsenal is going to work the hardest to get to that 300 800. KISS
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: born2bowl2 on February 04, 2013, 12:11:22 PM
800
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Steven on February 04, 2013, 12:23:11 PM
It's not an easy answer for me. I had a 300/802 a couple of weeks ago, and what stuck with me was the 300. It was one of those rare nights where I felt locked in and every shot that game was legitimate, so it felt great. I didn't know I had thrown a 800 until someone mentioned it to me after we finished everything up.
There was nothing like getting that first 800 several years ago, but after you've accumulated several of each, at least for me, a good 300 is special.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: ithinkican on February 04, 2013, 02:41:38 PM
Is this really a question? 300 is perfect, while 800 is not......
Cav
I am not positive but it takes a legit 30 strikes out of 36 in order to bowl an 800. 12 strikes is way easier than 30.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Uncle Crusty on February 04, 2013, 03:24:38 PM
Little thought experiment: Say you have a handful of both 300's and 800's (so you're not looking to pop any cherries). You have 500 even turning the corner and the first 11 the last game. Are you thinking "I need this hit for 300" or "I need this hit for 800"?
I guarantee that almost all of you are thinking both (I would be). Which means every honor score is equally special. That's my answer.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: cav on February 04, 2013, 03:53:20 PM
Anybody can get lucky and shoot 300, but it's harder to get that lucky for an 800! I've seen several people get 300's and not shoot 600 with a lots of brooklyn strikes!
Not sure anyone can. I have been bowling since 73 and have had the front 11, 2 times. Once for 298 my 3rd of bowling and then 30 years later and shot 297.
When I tell people I have never shot 300 or 800, they all say, I would never have thought that after seeing you bowl.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: hhhbs1 on February 04, 2013, 04:05:43 PM
To answer the op question. I will take either one. Both of them are accomplishments. 300 can be tough because you have to carry 12 in a row which at times can be a pain. The 800 is tough because you can only miss a few times over 3 games. One thing I have learned this season about shooting 800. Its almost as important in where you miss as it is how many times you miss.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: cav on February 04, 2013, 04:06:43 PM
Is this really a question? 300 is perfect, while 800 is not......
Cav
I am not positive but it takes a legit 30 strikes out of 36 in order to bowl an 800. 12 strikes is way easier than 30.
You can bowl a 800 with 24/36 strikes.........only 66.667%
Really? I would like to see how that scoring works if you don't mind. I would never have thought it possible.
I agree. I don't see how that is possible as stated (24/36). That means that the 10, 11th and 12th balls of all three games were strikes, leaving only 15 strikes for the rest of the frames (15/27). I don't see 800 that way.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: hhhbs1 on February 04, 2013, 06:05:50 PM
I did this real quick math so I might be wrong and i think someone else might have posted this, but if you go 9/ next 8 then 9/ 9 that equals 268. you do that 3 games its 804. Which is 24 strikes in the set. Now its not 24/36 like some one else stated, but it is 24 strikes. It would be 24/33 strikes.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: milorafferty on February 04, 2013, 06:15:54 PM
I did this real quick math so I might be wrong and i think someone else might have posted this, but if you go 9/ next 8 then 9/ 9 that equals 268. you do that 3 games its 804. Which is 24 strikes in the set. Now its not 24/36 like some one else stated, but it is 24 strikes. It would be 24/33 strikes.
Ah, ok. That would do it then. I think it was meant as 24 of a possible 36 strikes. I would still rather have that than a 300. And it would be one heck of a triplicate! ;D
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: hhhbs1 on February 04, 2013, 06:34:58 PM
Oddly enough if you go 9/ 9/ 9/ then off the sheet its still 268, but you have to strike 3 more times. You can also go x x 9/9/off the sheet for you guessed it 268 lol That is why i said earlier its almost as important on when you miss then how many times you miss.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Bowl_Freak on February 04, 2013, 06:55:09 PM
I would give a couple of my 300s for another 800. 300s aren't what they used to be. It's not uncommon to have 2-3 a league night. 800s are harder, u gotta keep up with transition and most of all, pretty much carry 30+ shots a series. You could miss 2shots a game and shoot 268 each game and shoot 804.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: MI 2 AZ on February 04, 2013, 07:34:15 PM
Ok, I was wrong, you can still get an 801 if you have eight strikes in a row starting with the 4th frame and leave a nine count in the 12th for a 267 each game. That will qualify the 24/36 statement.
That gives me hope, now all I need is the skill. :)
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: DrBob806 on February 04, 2013, 08:54:01 PM
Front 9, with a 9-miss in all three games is 267 triplicate for 801. Fun with math lol
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: batbowler on February 04, 2013, 09:26:30 PM
12 frames in a game x 3 games = 36 possible strikes and if they got the 8 strikes per game x 3 = 24 strikes, that would answer the stated 24/36 comment!
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Tex on February 04, 2013, 09:38:42 PM
Would like to have another 300, seem to hang 10's or 4's so keep ended up at 299. Given the choice I would rather shoot 800. Had a few in practice sessions, but keep falling short in league.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: BOWLGNUT on February 05, 2013, 10:19:17 AM
I rather take what ever comes first.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: flipperpower on February 06, 2013, 01:18:45 PM
I have had 1 800, and although i know it is tougher than a 300(have 6) for some reason i feel such a rush bowling a perfect game....when that last ball hits the lane and you KNOW its going to carry the adrenaline is at its peak, at least for me. my first 800 i started the night with a 300, missed 2 7 pins had one spare 257, 257
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: dudester300 on February 06, 2013, 05:26:48 PM
800 any day !
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: Xcessive_Evil on February 08, 2013, 12:42:17 AM
Since I have 300s, that just leaves the 8.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: ithinkican on February 08, 2013, 11:23:03 AM
If you were to bowl an 800 nobody could really talk smack about you. A 300 can be bowled off of luck and not pure skill level. This here is a perfect example. This past Tuesday night, my team bowled against this man who carries a 168 average. Until Tuesday he told me his high game was a 229. This 168 bowler tops the ball tremendously and throws it across a 15 board region. He shot 300 against my team but you should see his series. These were his games 300, 123, and 128. That does not even total to 600!!!! I rolled a 258, 245, & 266 and this luck bowler got more credit for his almost 600 than I did for my almost 800!!! Well to me A 300 is more fun than an 800 but an 800 proves you are more than just a lucky bowler.
Title: Re: 300 or 800 which would you rather have ?
Post by: JamminJD on February 08, 2013, 03:24:22 PM