Home
Ball List
Ball Reviews
Forum
User List
Help
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
BallReviews Forum
»
General Category
»
Miscellaneous
»
607a se vs hellraiser
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: 607a se vs hellraiser (Read 1046 times)
ecc0_9879
Hero Member
Posts: 1132
607a se vs hellraiser
«
on:
September 29, 2011, 02:44:56 PM »
Ok I had a 607 last year and it was the flippiest ball i have ever thrown. I am now bowling on synthetics and last year was wood. I would say the oil is about the same the only difference is the synthetics get the backends cleaned better. I am wondering if the hell raiser is as flippy as the 607 of if i should just buy another 607 and call it good? Also if someone who has thrown both or seen them both could compare the two for me i would greatly appreciate.
http://s572.photobucket.com/albums/ss169/ecco_9879/
Logged
scotts33
Hero Member
Posts: 8452
Re: 607a se vs hellraiser
«
Reply #1 on:
September 29, 2011, 11:15:01 PM »
For one to judge they would need bowler stats. ball layout comparison one to the other, ball surface, lane condition and lane topography and surface...then you might get a fair comparison.
Scott
Logged
Scott
ecc0_9879
Hero Member
Posts: 1132
Re: 607a se vs hellraiser
«
Reply #2 on:
September 30, 2011, 07:59:27 AM »
both oob im a cranker 475 rpm 17.5-18 mph one wood house dirty backends new synthetic house with clean backends
http://s572.photobucket.com/albums/ss169/ecco_9879/
Logged
ecc0_9879
Hero Member
Posts: 1132
Re: 607a se vs hellraiser
«
Reply #3 on:
September 30, 2011, 03:58:10 PM »
ttt
http://s572.photobucket.com/albums/ss169/ecco_9879/
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
BallReviews Forum
»
General Category
»
Miscellaneous
»
607a se vs hellraiser