win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: A suggestion for Tamerbowling.  (Read 5639 times)

milorafferty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11193
  • I have a name, therefore no preferred pronouns.
A suggestion for Tamerbowling.
« on: June 30, 2011, 01:29:01 AM »
If you are going to post a review here, POST the review here. And if you somehow can't manage that, when you have a redirect link back to your site for the review, HAVE THE REVIEW POSTED ALREADY! "Written review coming soon" is BS since we have already tried looking at it twice. 
Logged
"If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

"If you don't stand for our flag, then don't expect me to give a damn about your feelings."

 

Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: A suggestion for Tamerbowling.
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2011, 07:19:36 PM »

BR, land of the offended.

Get over it, you've wasted more time spouting off than pressing back.

There is only one rule on the internet: Porn.


 
Edited by Anonymous on 6/30/2011 at 7:26 PM
Logged

rustylegacy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
Re: A suggestion for Tamerbowling.
« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2011, 07:34:44 PM »
:-)

Logged

lefty50

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
Re: A suggestion for Tamerbowling.
« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2011, 10:32:21 PM »
If a site is going to be a resource for reviews (Tamer), it's a waste of time to pollute another source (in this case Ballreviews) with ads to your source.

 

Not high on the list of things that really matter, but I agree with the others it's bad form. Now, posting it and then not even having the review, that's completely bogus.

 

Having said that, I agree that the site itself is well done. It definitely takes an enormous amount of time.


Signature? I dont need no stinking signature...
 
Edited by lefty50 on 6/30/2011 at 10:35 PM
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »