Am in my early-mid fifties, but until this year, I have been a speed dominant/rev challenged bowler, so I rarely had the need for a plastic ball in my arsenal. On the few occasions when the lanes were drier than usual, I just threw harder or picked up one of my older reactives, and with the reduced friction and reaction in comparison to my newer and more aggressive stuff, problem was solved.
But for the last year or so, my speed has been diminished by a hip/leg injury (bursitus and god knows what else), and/or the lanes have been much drier than before, and last night, my old Brunswick Black Diamond (circa 1976-1979?) saved my ***butt in the last game. But it is the ONLY non-reactive ball in my possession, so I'm thinking about adding a plastic ball to my arsenal.
Is there any advantage (or disadvantage) on very dry lanes to a plastic ball versus a weak or dead reactive (which I have plenty of)? I would think that most times I'd be better off with the reactives, cause the cores would be stronger. And last night was extreme. But maybe that condition will come up more often now.
(Oh... the black diamond is an old drilling, and I doubt I could find someone to plug and redrill it. So while it worked last night, the fit is less than ideal in the long run.)
***PS: I cannot believe I was censored from using the word A_S in the context in which it was used above. That word is in the dictionary ?!?!?!