Even though the other teams have coaches by title, doesn't mean they have coaches that know what they are doing. Some teams have good coaches like Fresno St. with Ric. Some teams have idiots like Texas A&M when I was coaching there. I have learned a lot since then and could do a much better job now, but I don't think I can ever be as good as Ric or some of the better teams.
I have to agree with this as well.
Giz, if you get the chance, watch the finals of the Music City classic. You'll see some great team bowling, and 2 phenomenal games shot by Nebraska and Vanderbilt. Note where they were playing versus where the other teams were throughout the entire course of the day, let alone the tournament.
To emphasize Nebraska for a bit.. Their coach is the coach I had 20 years ago. He's still running the program there, which produced some great bowlers; two off the top of my head are PWBA champion Brenda (Norman) Mack, Diandra Asbaty, Brenda Edwards, and Kim Straub. I want to say that Machuga came from there as well (was after my time). But it wasn't that they produced that talent; it was there from the word go.
The coaches helped us out a lot with adjustments, as with me, putting together a completely different look than what I was used to doing. From the short number of 300s I've bowled (five), 2 were shot with my B game, with the rest being my A game. To be able to change my equipment, look, and my form (albeit slightly), not only gave me a new line to play, but also helped with others to get them to ball down, and throw a new line that isn't in their comfort zone.
It does help that the coaches should know what they are doing, but it does come down to the bowlers, and their ability to throw good shots. Perhaps at that part, they are too busy worrying about their chants than executing the shot..?
BL.