USBC is currently investigating static weights, however we have not made a recommendation at this time regarding the future of static weights. We are waiting for test data to make those decisions.
To answer some of the questions.
No, we would not take bowling balls out of your hands, we have only done this one time in history with the Sure-Ds and it is not something that we would like to do. Just like the new surface roughness specification, the Block LT-48 would actually fail the new surface roughness specification, however that ball is being grandfathered in and if you still use it, you can keep using it.
JohnP's assessment is absolutly true, we have a recommendation from a couple of manufacturers currently that we should have a max top weight rule, and let ball drillers drill the ball how they want. As long as the ball has X amount of top weight it is legal. As a rule of thumb, after we announce a specification change, we have to give at least 9-15 months of time for bowling ball manufacturers to adjust to a specification. So that they are ready for them. But we will not make a recommendation to change the specification until after testing is completed.
Paul
--------------------
"Oops, Looks like we are going to need another timmy." -Dr Lizard, "Dinosaurs"