A couple of years ago I was bowling PBAX, we were on Shark one night, my second-worst pattern.
I've had very limited success, ever, bowling it inside. I have to go outside -- way outside, in Norm Duke Land -- if I want to score.
So after about six frames of spraying the ball around inside, I went out, and I ended up shooting something like 165-180-190, and by the end of the third game it was starting to get fun. But that's where we stopped, of course.
So I'm putting my gear up and out of one ear I hear one of the guys that was on my pair griping about how "people don't know how to break down the pattern," "guys being selfish" and some other stuff. This league was sort of strange in its setup -- it was a singles league, but you bowled with the same three "teammates" every week. You just didn't count it as a team score.
So I asked one of his other regular teammates if the guy was talking about me, and he said, "Yeah, it was you and one of your teammates" -- meaning a guy who averaged about 140 that year, sprayed the ball mercilessly and wasn't really PBAX-ready in the first place. I doubt that guy had a plan to begin with.
So here's my argument:
* It's a singles league. I'm not really obliged to work with anyone. But sometimes, I will.
* However, "sometimes" isn't the Shark pattern. If I move in to try to help you break down the pattern the way you want it broken down, I'm going to shoot my IQ, if I'm lucky.
* Is it more "selfish" of me to bowl my game than it is for you to expect everyone to play it the way you want it played so you can have a shot at 240?
On top of this, this league was scored head-to-head, bowler-against-bowler, match-play style. Total pins didn't matter for any kind of league standings, so as long as you beat the guy across from you by 1, you got a point, whether that was 278-277 or 65-64.
I'm all for lane play strategy as a group, but there's a limit. Maybe if this was truly a team thing, I would have been more open to it.
Jess
Edited on 11/22/2008 0:03 AM