win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Recreating the Game  (Read 1057 times)

MichiganBowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Recreating the Game
« on: April 13, 2005, 12:19:45 AM »
I think the sport of bowling needs to employ a psychologist...a brilliant psychologist (psychiatrist?  what's the difference anyways).  In bowling's hayday, the sport was as close to fair as it could have been.  Everybody used the same equipment basically (rubber is rubber) and the better bowlers rose to the top...almost all of the time.  The sport had structure from the top down.  Team bowling was #1.  Entire communities supported each and every bowling center through both participation and sponsorship.

Over the last 25+ years, technology has ruled this sport.  One single theme has been perpetuated over this period of time--make the sport easier.  

Market a bowling ball as the best ever made, because it strikes better than any ball before it.  

Come to our bowling center because we have the "best shot" in town.

These are the most common and obvious aspects of the theme which has played out for nearly 3 decades.

So with nearly 30 years of this theme being perpetuated, what will happen if we suddenly go back to 1975?  Or 1965?  Or 1955?  What would a psychologist/atrist tell us?  People have been told that they are 210 average bowlers when in fact they are glorified 175 average bowlers, so what happens when we toss them back to 175?  Will education help in the transition?

Or do we simply need to use such tools as sport bowling as a means of recreating the sport with those few of us who believe in it?  We could basically consider it a different sport altogether and watch our new sport boom as bowling did back in the good ol' days.

Is my logic really so far off?
--------------------
Brian
MichiganBowling.com
http://www.MichiganBowling.com

Famous Last Words of a Pot Bowler--"Ok, but this is my last game!"
Brian
MichiganBowling.com
http://www.MichiganBowling.com

Famous Last Words of a Pot Bowler--"Ok, but this is my last game!"

 

MonkeyBoy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 622
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2005, 08:24:30 AM »
Sorry to jest but....
There should be a league that will only allow rubber balls, and flat patterns.


can you even get rubber balls anymore ?



--------------------
MonkeyBoy

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2005, 10:43:49 AM »
Brian: The reality is that the existence of bowling as a 'sport' is secondary to house owners making a profit. And profit is maximized by catering to the desires of social bowlers who want to have fun first and bowl second.

I don't know how anyone can change this. The league bowler who's the cash cow to house owners are the ones who eat, drink and make merry while they bowl -- the antithesis of dedicated scratch bowlers who value integrity and who would tolerate a lower scoring pace.

I sincerely hope someone or some organization can come up with an answer that will alter the thinking and direction of proprietors. I just haven't seen it yet.




--------------------
"You want the truth? -- You can't handle the truth! "

Edited on 4/13/2005 10:38 AM

MichiganBowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2005, 11:17:45 AM »
It appears as though I have failed in making my point...

True enough, 99% of the golf population, 99% of the tennis population, and 99% of yes, the bowling population cannot see the problem with the technology, so they would mostly quit if technology went back say 30-40 years.  

My first point was, I wonder what a psychologist might tell us about it all.  I remember the movie "Pleasantville" where the home team always won and everybody always had a great day and everything was always "pleasant".  Well in reality such a world doesn't exist, but we think if we do a, b, and c that we will be happy or "pleasant".  Many of us are wise enough to know that this is just mythology, and know that if we truly have to work at something that it will make us a better and happier person in the long run.

The world has played a cruel joke on us all, er, I mean the bowling world has played a cruel joke on us all.  They told us that if we embrace new technology and easier scoring conditions, that we will be happier in the end.  Once we saw that it wasn't true, the world, er, the bowling world started to lie to us and tell us that this is how things always were and that it cannot be changed.  Play this out for several years and pretty soon the world, er, bowling world actually has people preaching the lies to the masses and it becomes "general knowledge".

This is where we are stuck now.  We have a general population of bowlers that don't know a better way and believe that things are the best that they can be.  They cannot fathom (phathom?) how throwing a rubber bowling ball on a flatter oil pattern would somehow make them a happier bowler.  They believe that happiness and contentment only exist about 1% - 5% of the time in life, and the same is true with bowling, so they accept the fact that they will score once in a while and that is what will make them happy.  They don't care how the score happens, they just know that the score is what makes them happy, and that it will happen almost randomly whether they practice or not.

Bones, you know there was a better world, er, I mean bowling world.  You lived in it.  How can you just accept the way things are and let, or in fact, PREACH that things can never be that way again simply because everybody has been fooled for 30 years.  

We can start the whole bowling trend again right now with the few of us that believe and want to see it happen.  The only thing that exists today that didn't back then is the naysayers.  Nobody was there saying it cannot happen or will not happen, because they were truly excited about the growth of the sport and the fun they had.  Bones, this movement might not run its course in your lifetime, but who cares?  The fact that it started again in OUR lifetime should not only be enlightening, but encouraging when we think about where the world (bowling world) may be heading and how we played a part in it all!

If the world is more screwed up upon my departure than it was when I came into it, then we have all failed and led meaningless lives.  I for one would just quit bowling right now if I thought the sport was doomed to continue it's demise.  

I just ain't ready to cash in my bowling equipment yet!
--------------------
Brian
MichiganBowling.com
http://www.MichiganBowling.com

Famous Last Words of a Pot Bowler--"Ok, but this is my last game!"

Edited on 4/13/2005 11:14 AM
Brian
MichiganBowling.com
http://www.MichiganBowling.com

Famous Last Words of a Pot Bowler--"Ok, but this is my last game!"

pin-chaser

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2005, 03:14:40 PM »
The Kegel company attempted to host a team tournament not so long ago. The premise was that they developed a bowling lane surface that they could control the levelness of. They could make them flat, arched or inverted. They also built a bowling center that controlled humidity and there own oil to use. There goal was to break the 5 member team record and was offering 1M to first team that would score 4000+ (800x5 men) in the finals.

In reality they were slapping the face of ABC by attempting to prove that all the tollerances involve in this sport could be lined up that people would average 267... in essence saying the sport was too easy.

There was not enough interest in the event to make it happen and so it folded. I wonder why that is??? I mean the 5 man team record was recently set at the ABC's were the scoring pace is understood to be more difficult that THS. And an 850 something shot there too.

1 million dollars, 200,000 each man to shoot 4000 and not enough interest even when you have the perfect lane, the perfect condition and the perfect humidity (less break down).

Could it be that the sport has become so easy and dependant on "matching up" that the bowlers dont feel they could do it? I tried like anything to put a 5 man team together from here, even offering to pay the entry fee for the chance. But everyone was simply too busy to try. What a joke.

Brian, I dont know what those doctors would say about the state of the mentality of the bowlers today and the scoring... all I know is that everyone must know that they cant bowl because the technology gives them the scores. And that is indeed a sad sad statement about this pasttime (note: I did not say a sport..because if there was skill involved this tournament would have worked).
--------------------

Bowling Tips and Articles at: www.bowlingknowledge.com
IRC: Internet Relay Chat on Dalnet #striketalk. 24x7x365
Sponsored by: http://bowlerx.com



Chasing pins for 45 years.

janderson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2181
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2005, 05:10:41 PM »
To me, it is just an extension of our society, take the easiest way out, take the results without the work, dedication, or effort.  That's part of it.  The other part is how we treat little Johnny.  Growing up, if you weren't good enough to make the team, you didn't play baseball.  Period.  Today, we need to validate little Johnny's ego by making sure he gets a chance to play and we tell him he's just as good (which, at baseball, he may not be) as anyone else.  When little Johnny grows up and thinks about spending his entertainment dollar, he's not going to spend it on bowling if bowling doesn't validate Johnny's ego.

--------------------
Kill the back row (or maybe this should read "make your spares, dummy")

EastonCxN

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2005, 05:11:39 PM »
Hey, i live in Michigan, lol i did not check your name just seen it said michiganbowling lol, im 15

--------------------
C-x-N  

seadrive

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
Re: Recreating the Game
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2005, 05:24:13 PM »
A psychiatrist is an M.D., while a psychologist is not.

An ophthalmologist is an M.D., an optometrist is not.

I really don't know what the answer is, but I know that equipment has really leveled the playing field.  I lost two match points this week to a young lady who was throwing a dull Track Animal, on second-shift lanes where the strongest ball I could start with was a polished D/T Thing.

In the first 20-30 feet of the lane, her ball actually spun backward, toward the foul line.  Around 35 feet, it started rolling forward, toward the pins.  This allowed the ball to get through the heads, set up outside the pocket, and crush the rack.  I couldn't believe my eyes.  I'll have to try that someday...

I would gladly go back to rubber or urethane, on a fairly flat pattern.
--------------------
seadrive
Cogito ergo bowl


Edited on 4/13/2005 5:18 PM