Since it’s a slow nite here at work, thought I would get your opinion on a new method of averages and making sandbagging a little harder.
ABC says you have an established average after 21 games. OK, no problem with that, but lets always base the average off of the LAST 21 games. In other words, after you finish a week, the secretary drop the oldest week out of the equation. This would be a more accurate average than the running total we now use.
Here’s what I see every year in my leagues. First night, everyone establishes a new average. “Supposedly†a lot of the members of my leagues don’t bowl during the summer and forgot how. It seems like they don’t remember anything about the game until the 2d or 3d quarter when they have enough games in that their average will only increase by maybe a pin or two. Of course when its roll off time a lot of these guys look like professionals. Nothing to lose, they are going to get to start a new average next year anyhow.
If the league used those last 7 weeks of league and carried it over to the next year, it would sure make sandbagging a little more difficult. What are they going to do, throw off 4 out of the 7 weeks. Sure won’t make the roll offs that way.
I’m going to try and get this into our league rules this year. With this system, I wouldn’t mind giving up the 100% handicap.
--------------------
~~~SrK - Have balls, will travel
1st law of combat, "Bullets always have the right of way"