and woosh. that was the sound of the point going over your heads. But I wasn't clear either.
I never said I wanted to use banned cleaners or that I did. When you look at my shelf you see clean and dull, black magic, reacta clean, storms step 2 and 3, a couple bruns finishing compounds and an ebo/power house polish that name escapes me at the moment.
My point before was that why try to regulate something that USBC has no chance of enforcing? At the lanes it is easy, assuming league managers and tournament directors pay attention. in the pro-shop it is doable, but not as easy. At home, it is impossible. USBC if they thought someone used an illegal cleaning product/polish, ect cant come into a bowlers home. Unless there is some non-evasive test at the lanes (perhaps the test of the hardness of the surface) how can anyone prove an illegal compound was used on a ball in pre-tournament preparation?
USBC trying to fully regulate this just seems to be a fools errand; and a place that perhaps USBC could find a better use of their time.
atleast the example given by Astro of a banned substance being used is a situation that can be and should be stopped.