To take up the argument of Jason G: there are hardly any bad balls around, and I find it most positive to try out different stuff or use balls that are "one of a kind offers", especially when it is a ball that fills an arsenal gap. Just sticking to one manufacturer for some unfathomable reason and conservative attitude is not my thing, and in fact I have found myself using many companies in my quite short bowling career (Brunswick/MoRich, Columbia, Ebonite/Hammer, Storm, Visionary). I can hardly tell if any manufacturer in general was better than another, or works better for my style. I rather look at the core numbers, and if I can find some reference for the coverstock, the better. I know which kind of ball works for me by design - beyond the company. In fact, there are only a few options I would not take or try.
I just went away from Storm after their Reactor introduction, and find myself back with Brunswick covers every now and then, though mainly through MoRich balls.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Doing legwork on bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Edited on 4/26/2007 11:26 AM