The ABS videos are really good, and somebody (I think it was Jeff Ussery?) also used two cameras for the same shot, so you get two angles on one and the same shot - what helps IMO a lot to judge a ball's reaction.
Anyway, besides the fact that many ball videos look similar (well, we just have 39 boards, and the ball ...hooks!), it is hard to judge the recation because so many factors are involved. Almost nobody provides the conditions the ball is tested on, and even if you get that info, a) lane surfaces can have another huge impact and b) do we BELIEVE that it actually is a 42' flat sport shot and not a THS or another tampered thing?
While a video is entertaining, I fear we never come to a point where we could actually have a lab condition that allows a repeatable ball test. I'd even assume that a video is actually only meaningful for that specific ball and bowler.
When I tried to put toghether ball videos, I found myself ending up witha pretty long introduction into the ball specs, its layout, my style stats and (if possible) the lane condition. And even comparing balls takes a lot of "on air" time, unless you just use one shot.
For reference:
http://de.video.yahoo.com/watch/5385930/14191023I think you can easily fill 10 min and more with "info" about just one ball.
Anyway, I support the idea of complete info and "neutral" ball testing with various players, drillings, surfaces and even lanes. But it literally takes time, both in preparation and broadcasting, and the circumstances will remain dubious.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section