I hate that phrase "Subject to forfeiture".
Does that mean if the offender is a friend of the president, he won't have to forfeit?
Who decides that the game will be forfeit?
I would assume the opposing captain has to ask the league officers to make a ruling, but this being the USBC and subject to the whims of the local constabulary, who knows?
In this case, the league President told the opposing captain it WAS happening and the offender was already warned by the President. Isn't that or shouldn't that be an automatic forfeiture?
What's the real story here?
What did happen?
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."