I was fleshing out an argument for debate in a different thread when I had an idea. Would something similar to Skiing's NASTAR courses be worthwhile in our sport?
Here is the idea behind Nastar,
You have a pro go down a course & set the national "target" time. From there, depending on age & the difficulty of the course you are racing on, you are given a handicap. The idea is then with your handicap to beat that target time. Courses are set up all over the nation & you are all competing against that Pro's time even though you are all in different parts of the country.
Maybe we could setup a pair of lanes at participating houses where they have the same sort of "pay to play" system. The lanes would always have a PBA shot on them & be kept in very good shape. A 3 game set on those lanes would cost a bit more than on normal lanes, but after you are finished, your series is entered into the system & you are kept in the national database just like Nastar. Small prizes would be given out accordingly (pins, badges) & you could even register to compete in larger events.
The thing that really made me think about applying this to our sport was this segment from an article on the history of nastar.
I want you to read this & everytime you see the word skiing, replace it with bowling.
In the October, 1967 edition of SKI, Fry wrote a strongly-worded editorial deploring the "sorry state of affairs" of skiing at that time.
"We have forgotten that skiing is a sport, sport is competition, and that is what the fun and excitement is all about." He went on to say that the forbidding of practice in gatesread: practice on REAL oil patterns "is a policy that surpasses imbecility."
"Somewhere along the line, skiing has lost touch with competition. When it happened, we snuffed out a flame that should light our sport. It is sorely in need of re-ignition."
Does this sound familiar to anyone?
I know it's how I feel about our sport at this very moment. We need to do something before the SPORT of bowling is lost forever.