As a BTM subscriber, I couldn't help but notice that recently, the brands under the Brunswick umbrella have only been providing the HP balls for review to BTM. I received confirmation of this when I sent a message asking if/when there will be reviews posted for the mid and lower tier balls.
Specifically these are:
Brunswick Brute Strength, Soul and Soul Mate
DV8 Vandal and Holligan Taunt
Radical Primo, Rave, and both Rack Attacks
Now I know there are review balls being provided to other entities and publications (e.g., Bowlers Journal and Lane Side Reviews).
Perhaps I'm in the minority, but I put a lot of stock into the rating system I find in BTM;. I find it invaluable in quickly identifying equipment that may fill a hole. I can make a short list based on ratings and whittle it down from there. These Brunswick family balls will not be making those lists.
I'm sure they have their reason for short shrifting BTM; maybe they have internal numbers indicating not a lot of return from BTM subscribers? I have no affiliation with BTM other than being a paid subscriber.
I have been a big Radical fan (I've bought at least 9 of their balls and I only started bowling less than three years ago). I can't say they have all been winners for me, but I generally like their stuff. But I can't say that I will give serious consideration if I can't screen their ratings with BTM.