When is not shooting your highest possible score on a lane not considered sandbagging?
This question has recently crossed my mind. It was caused by the potentially damaging effects of consistently bowling on a Walled THS with desert-like outsides. This condition seductively lures the bowler into playing a 'bank-shot' to the pocket. And with its hold area inside and swing area outside, it erodes a player's focus and skills to the point where the 'board area' they are playing on the lane typically encompasses more than two arrows also. Thereby, rewarding(?) the bowler with inflated averages, withering skills and developing bad habits in the process.
So, if one chooses to not 'cheat' and use the Wall of China to Sahara Desert route to traverse the lanes. But rather, chooses to play a tighter, more demanding line through the oil the whole way to the Promised Land. (Preferring to pretend the Desert was not there and play the lanes as though there was a Sport shot on them...) IMHO--One would still be shooting the highest score they possibly can; but on that, the tougher, portion of the lane.
One's average would surely drop from, say, 220 to 200, but at the same time the bowler would also be honing his craft to enable himself to be a better bowler on tougher conditions.
Note: There aren't any Sport &/or Scratch Leagues in the area for a player to join.
Would this player then be in jeopardy of being called a sandbagger?
My opinion is 'no', but I am interested in other viewpoints.
Thank you.