win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Budget Constrained Arsenal  (Read 708 times)

EEW619

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Budget Constrained Arsenal
« on: May 31, 2006, 03:31:38 PM »
While I am highly impressed with the arsenal of balls assembled by the many enthusiasts who frequent this board to cover all manner of lane conditions, I typically limit myself to one new piece of equipment a year for budget reasons. I have found in reviewing my records that if I do a good job of matching that ball to the THS at an alley I will use that piece slightly over 85% of the time. As a stroker with not a lot of revs, I use very aggressive equipment to help carry. Because aggressive equipment dies out over time, the rest of my arsenal is built from previous year's purchases in varying states of decline. Therefore what I throw on dry lanes baffles most people because they only recognize the name as a "hook monster" and do not even stop to think what condition the ball is in or whether I polished it. Since these balls are used a total of less than 15% of the time, they further degrade very little and do not need to be benchmarked as often as one might think. What I was wondering was if there are others out there who use this strategy and what the consensus is on what carries better, a "used up" aggressive ball on dry lanes or a ball specifically engineered for this type of condition.
--------------------
Some people believe in miracles.
I have a tendency to rely on them.

EEW619

 

nospareball

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Budget Constrained Arsenal
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2006, 09:35:41 AM »
That's what I usually see at my house, the old guys with very little revs and slower speed throwing high end particle equipment.  The mindset is that if you're only going to buy one ball a year, or every couple years you might as well make it a top of the line monster.  I used to buy like that. I'd look for the biggest hook rating and drop the cash once a year, but I've found that these monster balls hook the same amount for me as mid range balls.  And I get a better read on the lane with less agressive stuff.  Not to mention that I can buy 2 balls a year and have equipment to cover a wider array of conditions.

You'd probably save money, time and score better if you bought a mid range ball and used it for the conditions it was intended (THS), instead of buying the hook monster and killing it with polish or letting it die.  That's just my opinion though.

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
Re: Budget Constrained Arsenal
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2006, 09:46:15 AM »
If you are to invest into a new ball and know that you stay in one house with a THS 85% of the year, a mid priced ball will do anyway.
--------------------

DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
UPDATED & NEW --- Team "X" website & more about me: http://web.mac.com/timlinked/iWeb/X/Thomas.html
"All that we see or seem, is but a dream within a dream..." - Edgar Allen Poe
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

Djarum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
Re: Budget Constrained Arsenal
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2006, 03:06:05 PM »
I've used this tactic for years, and so far it's worked pretty well. I just haven't found a good mid-priced ball that will move the way I want on my THS.

Dj
--------------------
The views and opinions of Djarum expressed on BallReviews.com do not necessarily state or reflect those of the BallReviews.com.