It depends on what physically matches up to your game, and which gives you the best chance to perform. The argument of cranker vs. tweener vs. stroker can go many different ways. Truth is each one presents it's own advantages and disadvantages.
One thing I think is a disadvantage about the rev monsters, is that they are pretty much at the mercy of the amount of oil and pattern on the lanes. In order to throw wicked revs, you have to have some oil to allow the ball to store energy and you also have to have some dry in order to shoot towards the pocket. If there is too much oil, the ball skids and too much dry the ball will suffer burnout.
If you can keep your big hook shot in your bag, and also develop a more tweener style, more power to you. I think the article in Bowlers Journal should have said the problem with the big crankers jumping on tour is, there are times that you cannot crank the ball. You have to take what the shot is giving you. However, if you can become great cranking the ball, and good enough stroking the ball, then you have just added versitility to your game. Thats what the best bowlers have that wannabe's don't. The ability to match up on the most amount of conditions.
Now Bones will present the counter argument, which is would you rather be dominant on one condition but suck on others, or be very good on all of them (jack of all trades, master of none)
I think of this like the Robert Smith vs. Chris Barnes argument. Smith pretty much owns pattern E, but Barnes will often show up on tv more since he can play anything.
--------------------
D <~~~~ Used to be terrible wiffing 10 pins. Now through much practice, can wiff any single pin spare at any time.
![](../Forum/icon_smile_blackeye.gif)
Darrell Guzman
guzmand19 - Yahoo IM and MSN screen names