win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?  (Read 5030 times)

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Hi All,

Would like to get your opinions on this topic, Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?

When considering that next new purchase, which is a more important factor?

Say you have ball A, which is an excellent ball, but for only 75-100 games...then you have ball B which is an average performing bowling ball, but lasts you 300-500+ games...which one do you go with, and be honest...

also please add if you bowl strictly leagues, or if you bowl tournaments regularly in addition to league, as that could have an effect on your decision

Thanks!


--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE
3G Shoes
Buddiesproshop.com

 

1MechEng

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Bowling Nerd Herd member
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #16 on: April 29, 2008, 09:04:40 PM »
For me, I prefer longevity to ultimate performance simply because I cannot buy a ball or two a year. I seem to go every 3-4 years between ball purchases, so this is a major factor in my decision.

My decision might be different if I was a pro and had 12 new balls per year.
--------------------
======================
Dan
======================
Engineering * Bowling = a fun and practical application of rotational kinematics.

Bowling Nerd Herd (TM) Member
Dan

themagician

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2008, 09:06:11 PM »
I'll take option A, just for the fact that I switch equipment so often and maintain my stuff very well and haven't dealt with ball death (well major ball death atleast, i have seen a small drop in ball reaction).
--------------------
http://www.absolutebowling.com NO TROLLS
-Mike
-MOTIV Staff

John D Davis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2008, 10:21:29 PM »
You know, if it all boils down to it... I think if someone really maintained his bowling ball well he would never experience "ball-death".
  If he/she cheaned thier balls regular and maybe baked/bathed them I really dont think ball-death would ever happen. I own a ball spinner, so its so much easier for me to keep my bowling balls in perfect condition. I have right now, 7 bowling ball polishes, 4 diff. cleaners, abralon pads, aceton, and wet sand paper. I know everyone wouldnt go to this extent to keep their balls in good condition but if you're a serious bowling then Id really consider getting a ball spinner...
  It has been by far the best 220$ investment I have ever made. Heck I even enjoy cleaning up my bowling balls after each session now. I used to be the one that cleaned his ball after say 50-75 games. Now I do after 2 .

  Bottom line is............. Oil absorption maybe a little higher or a little lower than some balls but the fact remains, bowling balls dont go through ball-death. I used to think so back in the days but now that know how to keep one up I have learned otherwise. Britton how do you feel about what I just had to say? Would you agree or disagree about balls dying...? I know you may not keep a bowling ball very long but you are in the business and you maybe perhaps see other people posing to this situation. Thanks for reading.

themachine300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2008, 10:23:17 PM »
As a tournament player, i'm taking performance.  If the ball makes me over $1K, i'll take that anyday over a ball that lasts a long time.  Then, I'll usually just buy another and sell the old one, even though most of the time, the cover can be restored via a rejuventor or the hot water method.  Performance all the way.
--------------------
www.bowlingsolutions.com

Move left, hook it more.....

Tommy Jones is a Gamecock fan...are you???

We shall now refer a 4-bagger as a hambone...Mark it down the revolution has started!

Edited on 4/29/2008 10:24 PM
Philipp Hudak
Ebonite Amateur Staff
Bowl To Win!
#TeamEBI

stormed1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1755
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #20 on: April 29, 2008, 11:53:22 PM »
Performance! It's pretty rare for me to have more than 40-50 games on a ball before it's been replaced with something else. Plus I maintain my equipment so that does'nt hurt its life span.
Current arsenal


Break Down 60x4.5x60 @3k+polish
coming soon X,Desert Ops,Special Ops, Shadow Ops., Truth Pearl ,Drift

jd1319

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #21 on: April 30, 2008, 12:05:50 AM »
Both, there are some brands out there like lanemaster who offer a great combination.  Since their top of the line equipment uses a lot more coverstock that most brands, their performance doesn't drop off nearly as quick as many others.

williewc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 846
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #22 on: April 30, 2008, 12:09:22 AM »
i bowl leagues 2 nights a week year round sub on 2 others, i bowl in 4-5 tournaments each year(state mens, state mixed, nationals the last 2 years, Southeast Regional the last 4 years)

but i dont really have the money to buy new balls at the rate most of the people on this site does

i want both performance and lifespan, if i can only get 50 games out of a ball i dont want it, i dont care if that ball won me nationals i wouldnt get another one after it died

i havent bought a ball in over a year and they still react just as good as when i bought them for the most part, hell the first ball i ever bought was the Track Threat 4 1/2 years ago and only threw it the first year i bowled and probably put close to 1000 games on it that year, i can still take it out to the lanes and watch it hook just as good as it did when i bought the ball

none of my balls react any different that when they were new and if they do start to hook less its nothing a good deep cleaning wont cure

hell every ball i have probably has over 500 games on them except for maybe the Phoenix
--------------------

Proud member of the Track Legion

Tag Team Coaching Success Story


Foppe

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 71
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #23 on: April 30, 2008, 04:44:34 AM »
Both, that's why in the future I will look more and more into Lanemasters/Legend

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2008, 05:18:35 AM »
quote:
Well..if you'rer not gonna NAME names...it mean's you've GOTTEN INTO BED w/some ball company's...so as to GET BALLS cheap...INSTEAD of doing HONEST ACCURATE review's...much like the bowling magazine's!

oh well..........................................................................................................................................................


IM a little confused by this statement?  Ask anyone who has talked to me and asked me advice, they know i say all the companies are good, and i treat every company the same way, no-one gets any special treatment...i have no particular favorites, i throw what works best for me in my own personal life, if someone asks me whats in my bag currently i tell them

to say that i dont do fair accurate reviews is incorrect, and i would appreciate it if you wouldnt jump to a conclusion with a lame attack like that...

I simply did not name names because everyone has their own idea of which companies last longer than others...you may think brand x balls last forever while another guy may think his brand lasts forever and yours is junk...everyone could interpret the question differently because they DO have their favorites

--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE
3G Shoes
Buddiesproshop.com

Edited on 4/30/2008 5:34 AM

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6764
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2008, 07:17:04 AM »
If I were a big time serious tournament bowler who counted on my bowling earnings as a decent chuck of my income, I guess I'd choose performance.  But since I've never had a WOW factor out of the box with anything I've ever owned, I'll take longevity.
--------------------
Penn State Proud

Special thanks to Lane#1 for donations to two consecutive  Ballreviews Get Togethers.

Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive

VideoBallReviews

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 873
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2008, 07:29:37 AM »
quote:
Bottom line is............. Oil absorption maybe a little higher or a little lower than some balls but the fact remains, bowling balls dont go through ball-death. I used to think so back in the days but now that know how to keep one up I have learned otherwise. Britton how do you feel about what I just had to say? Would you agree or disagree about balls dying...? I know you may not keep a bowling ball very long but you are in the business and you maybe perhaps see other people posing to this situation. Thanks for reading.


I actually have thrown a few balls long enough to experience a form of death...if i like a ball enough, it stays in my bag for awhile...now they did not full out go straight as an arrow, but they did not perform as well as OOB for me, even with recessatation...and this wasnt just from one company either...

Your typical bowler will experience ball death, simply because they refuse to clean their stuff...i bet about 15-20% of league bowlers actually clean their stuff regularly (after every 3 game set), many only clean their stuff when they start to see a decrease in reaction and unfortunately that is usually too late...plus im a full believer that most bowlers would rather complain about it anyway
--------------------
Britton (formerly bar5003)

Owner/Operator of Videoballreviews.com

Official Sponsors
VISE
3G Shoes
Buddiesproshop.com

n00dlejester

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
  • The Dude Abides
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #27 on: April 30, 2008, 07:33:52 AM »
Hahaha!  I totally agree Britton!  This 4th guy the house gave us in our league just complains about his lack of hook and refuses to do anything about it.  Talk about frustrating.  I would take longevity over performance.  I am a tournament bowler, but I'm not a regular at cashing in these.  Yet.  Hopefully that will change with more practice.  

And whoever said it, all maintenance is key to life.
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #28 on: April 30, 2008, 08:53:30 AM »
Presonally, I buy balls that offer a steady performance. This would rather tend towards option A, and recent experience has driven me away from Ebonite/Hammer due to the fact that the balls fall apart/lose performance pretty quickly. That's O.K. for the "seasonal" buyer/bowler, but not my style. Having a NIB ball cost about $300 around here, longevity is something that I tend to have in focus, and value for money.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Secrets revealed: What's a fugu?

DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

MC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1300
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2008, 09:27:22 AM »
League bowler who is starting to bowl some local tourneys. I will take Ball B, give me longevity and I will find the reaction that works. I don't need it to WOW anyone, just knock down the pins
--------------------
"Don't Give Up...  Don't Ever Give Up."
                    -Jim Valvano

"Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
                    -Vince Lombardi


VISIONARY TEST STAFF 07/08

Tag Team Coaching success story



TheProphet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Coverstock Lifespan Vs Performance...What is more imprtant to you?
« Reply #30 on: April 30, 2008, 09:45:30 AM »
Ball B..

Ebonite stuff dies on me.. no matter how good the ball looks I'll never throw it again. With that said.. Brunswick stuff doesn't look as good.. but I always have a good look with it and I'm usually bowling well with it. It just reads the lane opposed to the skid flip wow factor that ebonite gives off..

Yeah. Ball B.