Just Rico...Yesterday a customer came in with two old balls from the 90's..
A Piranha and a Beast...Neither one was cracked...And the shells on those balls were
much thicker...In that era most shells were 1 1/2" thick...Which became the reason
Thumb slugs became popular...
Today's shells are about 3/8" thick at best...and are more porous...
I don't ever recall having cracking issues with the balls from that era...
So IMO...I think it is possible that the thinner and more porous shells on today's balls
may indeed be a reason for all the cracking issues...
I find it rather ODD that all of a sudden...All the manufacturers are having curing issues...
Shells are about 20% as thick compared to balls of that era...That means boo koo
savings on material...
just my opinion...
I also have an opinion about Obama...oops...lol
Good post JLS!! This would be my reasoning as well. And I'm not buying the analogy of porous, translating to more flexible either! Porous means more permeable.....as in things, water , oil, air, etc. flowing through them.
In this case it's cracks that are flowing through. The new formulas make chemicals with loosely attached bonds that can more easily be broken. Hence cracks!
On the other hand, it is that same conglomeration of loosely nit chemicals which give these new covers their ability to grip the lanes through oil. So....it's a trade-off.
Exactly, just like there are no 80,000 mile performance tires for cars. Have to give up longevity to get the best performance.
But the ball companies still should own up to the facts instead of trying to tell us how it's "our fault" when a ball cracks.