I was slightly bored today and was searching around to try and find other balls that were similar to my Teal Rhino and was surprised to find just one other ball that had anywhere near the same specs. That ball was the Super Trooper by Columbia. Specs on the two balls are as follows:
Teal Rhino: RG 2.45, Diff 0.023, Reactive cover (not sure which one), 320 sanded from the factory.
Super Trooper: RG 2.487, Diff 0.020, Superflex coverstock; 500 grit cross hatched, then shined to 2000 from the factory(I think).
For me the Teal Rhino is very controllable. I have it at about a 1000 grit polish (very lightly polished) right now and it helps to smooth out the touchy patterns I usually see because it refuses to flip.....just ARC ARC ARC. I would tend to think that a Super Trooper (if left in box condition) would flip more than the Rhino due to it's Superflex coverstock and polished finish.
So my question is, why aren't there more balls like this with a Low RG and Low Diff?
Is this type of core specs/solid reactive cover combo and the reaction it gives just not desired on todays conditions?
The Teal Rhino is arguably my favorite ball of all time and it saddens me to know that the only way to replace it's reaction characteristics in my bag once it dies is to either find more Teal Rhino's, or try really weak/arcy layouts on other solid reactive balls.
If, in fact, there are/were other balls with similar specs made, please feel free to correct me.
While I'm at it I may as well ask this too:
If I were to get a Super Trooper, what kind of layout and surface prep could I give it that would best mimic my Rhino's reaction? I would try to get a Super Trooper with a similar pin-out/specs of course. The Rhino is drilled label and has a 1/2" pin at 1:30 from the CG (which is in my grip center due to the label drilling).
Pic can be seen here (it's very high quality so it may take time to load):
http://members.rogers.com/nostalgiazone/tealrhinopro.jpgMy specs/stats are in my profile.
- Chef
--------------------
http://www.ohmytrance.com