I agree!

Here is my suggestion when picking out new equipment.  Make 90% of your decision based on coverstock.  

For example, if you love light load particle balls, stick with those.  Or if you have success with a specific cover, like the Dyno-thane Soaker, then stick with those.  

Additionally, I would recommend symmetrical cores.  Asymmetrical cores can be awesome with the right drilling, but unless you already know that drilling, you might be disappointed unless you are ok with plugged balls.

Don't be afraid to try a new ball company.  And certainly don't be afraid to ask the staffers about a ball.  I get a couple private messages a week asking for ball/layout recommendations for Dyno-thane.  I'm sure other ball reps will be just as helpful.

What type of condition are you trying to get a ball for?

Tony
http://www.allBowling.com

The problem we, and the manufacturers run into is the lack of standardization in the industry.  For example, I consider my home house medium oil.  When I bowled in Florida what that called medium was dry to me.  Which standard is the manufacturer to use to describe a medium condition, the one from Florida or the one for my area.  Either way, one of them is going to be wrong and not match up.

The only thing I like about Brunswick is their charts.  If I’ve thrown one of their balls, a quick glance at the chart will show me what is stronger, weaker, longer, shorter, etc.

I’m like you Joe, haven’t bought a new ball in years, just try something used.  Probably why so many bowlers are enamored about one company or the other, it’s almost impossible to jump from one to the other without causing overlap with what you already have or getting a different reaction than what you expected.

--------------------
~~~SrK - Have balls, will travel

Old bowlers never die, we just don't score as often