win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Define sandbagging??  (Read 11342 times)

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Define sandbagging??
« on: September 03, 2012, 12:54:58 AM »
Ok Opinion based question.

You are bowling a league, standard easy THS. You know you can tear them up if you use reactive gear, stand left throw right watch them fall, but you decide to use urethane for the challenge of it and what the hell something different instead of the usual. You carry a 205 with the urethane probably could have been higher if you used reactive.

You go to state the following season using your 205 average, but you bring modern gear and do well. Are you sandbagging cause you used urethane in league? Or smart, because you worked on accuarcy and spare shooting in league with the urethane ball, essentially using league time as a practice session.   

IMO you are smart, prepping for a difficult shot using means open to you. Didn't miss spares on purpose you tried every week using sub standard (compared to modern gear) equipment.

I have not done this just a random question. I do use urethane in a couples league averaged 217 with it last year. But I bowled other leagues with reactive gear.
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

 

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4584
  • Former proshop worker
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2012, 03:40:46 PM »
If you bowled leagues with urethane knowing you would set a lower average to gain a advantage at tournament time then it is bagging.

Especially if you were spending all your true "practice" time and all your tournament games with your higher scoring equipment keeping your skills sharp with them.

dmonroe814

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
  • No Rewards or Punishments, Only Consequenses
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #17 on: September 03, 2012, 04:55:03 PM »
You should always try to score your best.  If you want to use Urethane to improve your accuracy, then you should do it in practice.
14lb 15.5 mph at pins 325 Revs. Silver Coach, Ball Driller. In Bag:  Storm Pro-Motion, Hyroad X, Matchup, Code Red.

BigHorhn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2012, 08:26:47 AM »
Charlest, me saying "Honest way of sandbagging" is my way of hypothetically discribing what the person using urethane equipment instead of using whats best (reactive) for the shot is thinking. He's not dumping the ball in the gutter or occastionally missing easy spares, so he thinks whats he's doing is alright. I personally think that its sandbagging.

trash heap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #19 on: September 04, 2012, 09:02:27 AM »
Those that state its sandbagging, well go ahead tell that story to a tournament director. "I know the guy can average more than 205, because he is throws a urethane ball back home".  So what do you think his tournament average should be? 210, 215, 220, 230?

Only the bowler knows of their true intentions. In this case with average over 200 I think this is not a problem. If the average was 170 or 180 and they guy is throw 220 and 230 games. I think you can cry foul, but its definitely more a realistic view that a 205 average can throw big games.
 

Talkin' Trash!

txbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2012, 10:40:31 AM »
This ball choice can play both ways.  A bowler can chose to throw too much ball, and score poorly, and no one will know the difference.  Only because bowler A throws urethane which is noticeable to the eye, does it call attention.

However, bowler B who throws, for example, a Nano all year on a dry shot will not score as high as possible when he has better choices in his arsenal (maybe) and then goes to tournaments and throws everything but the nano there because he knows the nano is too strong.

That's how easy it is to "sandbag" without drawing attention to yourself.

Also, I'd like to address the poster who said that if a bowler wants to throw a different ball, they should practice.  Most of the bowlers I know, which are the 200-225 variety, use league as practice for tournaments.  They go drill up something new and try it in league.  The alter a drill pattern on a ball and try it in league.  Only the serious regional/pba guys practice.  Most centers these days charge $3-$5 a game.  A 10 game practice session will run you upwards of $50.  I don't know too many guys who want to pay $50 to practice on what is normally fried conditions or cosmic bowling conditions on the weekends.  Most people have 9 to 5s during the day.

houseball69

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2012, 02:22:06 PM »
Using a houseball = sandbagging.
Houseball in the house!!

chuckysrevenge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #22 on: September 04, 2012, 02:31:03 PM »
I hate sandbaggers but hate houses with blocked shots and bloated averages worse.  >:(

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #23 on: September 04, 2012, 05:29:02 PM »
Those that state its sandbagging, well go ahead tell that story to a tournament director. "I know the guy can average more than 205, because he is throws a urethane ball back home".  So what do you think his tournament average should be? 210, 215, 220, 230?

Heap, the bowler who went to Urethane and averaged 205 did so to mix things up. The original premise was to get away from 'the usual'. This all suggests that he had a well established Resin average.
 
I'd like to think a tournament Director would be thankful for someone who would have the integrity man up and provide his Resin average for entering purposes.

Long Gone Daddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5471
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #24 on: September 04, 2012, 07:07:07 PM »
That's absolutely correct, only a bowler knows what his intentions really are.  All the rest is just speculation, excuse making, and bitching by the bowling police.  Plain and simple.


 
Those that state its sandbagging, well go ahead tell that story to a tournament director. "I know the guy can average more than 205, because he is throws a urethane ball back home".  So what do you think his tournament average should be? 210, 215, 220, 230?

Only the bowler knows of their true intentions. In this case with average over 200 I think this is not a problem. If the average was 170 or 180 and they guy is throw 220 and 230 games. I think you can cry foul, but its definitely more a realistic view that a 205 average can throw big games.
Long Gone also posts the honest truth which is why i respect him. He posts these things knowing some may not like it.

Mainzer

ccrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #25 on: September 04, 2012, 07:14:22 PM »
I must admit that I had decided to use two balls, urethane and plastic, during fall league. However, reading these post, I am having some reservation.

The point that stands out the most, is the unstated, but implied assertion that bowling competitively involves several different factors. One must have a solid physical game, be able to keep up with lane transition, and be able to pick the correct ball for the condition, in order to maximize scoring. 

If I intentionally choose a ball that I know will not maximize my score/average, and in fact that I know will lower my average, and then use that intentionally lowered average in tournament competition, it is hard to argue that I am not intentionally sandbagging.

Yet, I wanted to do this, not for the purpose of reducing my average, but to become a better bowler.  A horrible choice to have to make, all because the sport of bowling has been compromised by egotistical bowlers that would rather bowl on the wall of china and shoot grossly inflated scores, than on a shot that truly test, and allows them to hone, their skills.

I am leaning towards working on becoming a better to bowler. Let the critics land where they may.

Mighty Fish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2599
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #26 on: September 04, 2012, 07:31:03 PM »
Sandbagging -- according to the USBC rule book -- is defined as "maintaining an average below ability to gain an unfair advantage in handicap or classified competition" ... and that's as good a definition as any.

Steven

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7680
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #27 on: September 04, 2012, 09:59:45 PM »

If I intentionally choose a ball that I know will not maximize my score/average, and in fact that I know will lower my average, and then use that intentionally lowered average in tournament competition, it is hard to argue that I am not intentionally sandbagging.



CC, you nailed it. It can't be phrased much better. Nice job.

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #28 on: September 05, 2012, 01:15:03 AM »
Sandbagging: (v), a word that inconsistent league bowlers use as an excuse for throwing bad games when the lanes transition.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2012, 01:16:39 AM by DP3 »

trash heap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #29 on: September 05, 2012, 09:31:14 AM »
What I find amusing is we all agree that those who has an average established on THS is inflated yet we must take that inflated average to tournaments. But not everyone bowls on a THS so what should be the standard? (Interesting Question......
hmmmm ..... creating a standard pattern? ..... what a concept?)
Talkin' Trash!

txbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: Define sandbagging??
« Reply #30 on: September 05, 2012, 10:39:50 AM »
A standard pattern is a good concept that cannot be applied or enforced.  Every house is different.  Some houses have wood so old that any standard pattern will be tough no matter what.  Some houses have the flat gutters set at the highest limit which equals more carry and higher scores, others have lower settings which equal lower carry.  Some houses have owners who have opinions such as "Lefties will not score here" and could put out one shot when they know the lanes will be checked and then put out another shot that expresses their true thoughts.

I know that in some houses, what pair you are on makes all the difference in the world.

Even at the stadium in Reno, there are people who will tell you the high end or low end is better/worse.

You can try to standardize bowling all you want, but not every house has Kegel machines.  I still know of a house that uses a Century 100.  I believe that is from the 80s.  It doesn't know how to do red, white and blue patterns.

I doubt USBC is going to force all owners to spend 20 grand on new lane machines to use their patterns. 

Bowling for money is a competition.  And whenever their is a competition for money, some people will look for ways to cheat.  It happens in every sport and business.  You cannot stop it.  Vegas will tell you that they only catch probably 60% of the cheaters at gambling there.  Some athletes take steroids to perform better and get more money.  Baseball players have corked bats and scuffed baseballs with bits of sandpaper to get more money.  Medical labs charged medicare for labs tests that were not medically necessary to get more money. 

It's all cheating.  There is money involved.  It's going to happen.

If you can come up with a way to stop it, you will be rich because a lot of companies will pay you for that solution.