BallReviews
General Category => Miscellaneous => Topic started by: pin-chaser on October 01, 2005, 03:48:22 PM
-
I stepped into one of the highest scoring houses here in town Friday night. First time I have been there in a couple years. I saw a slew of past friends I used to bowl with when I bowled in that house. I saw all kinds of scores flying around from these guys. One kid cant hit within 5 boards of his break point in any successive shot. He was playing about 15/16/17 to 5-10 at the break point. He had a 7 bagger going into the tenth and got one out to 4/3 at the break point. It came roaring back and left a ringing 10. He missed it of course to shoot 240 something... he left something in the second frame. And this guy is Pi$$ed off complaining about carry.
Then I looked around and noticed something. EVERYONE had entry angles like I have never seen before. It was like the ball went 40' dead straight... starting rev'ing up and then took a left turn at 45' from anywhere I looked.
For many you know, I have not bowled in a couple years and I have been pretty familiar with creating entry angles, but I think the newest round of technology has stepped up the entry angle pace. I am again dissapointed that technolog has raised the bar again. When will it stop. When will the technology be the bowler and not what is in the hand?
--------------------
Bowling Tips and Articles at: www.bowlingknowledge.com
IRC: Internet Relay Chat on Dalnet #striketalk. 24x7x365
-
The majority of bowlers want to see the ball hook. They buy big backend balls, lay them for tons of backend, then crank the crap out of it trying to get the backend. That is why we see such extreme angles.
I have one ball that flat gets nasty on the backend. It occasionally gets used...
Andrew
--------------------
FUFU
Formerly known as agroves....
Join us @ www.bowlingballexchange.com
-
I have better luck with a smoother arcing ball. The snappy backend is less predictable for me and I do not "trust" that reaction. You are right though...the high-rev crankers are able to generate alot of area with the right ball on the right lane condition! Like always...it's about matching up. Entry angle is important, but it can be easy to lose focus on accuracy if you are only looking for the angle.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)
CHROME WON'T GET YOU HOME!
F.O.S. Proud Saw user... "Measure twice, cut once!"
-
Bones,
I am personally just about there. I am trying to bowl again. A couple times per month now I get the desire. Still shot about 650 every set despite not picking up a ball for 18 months and only bowling 6 games per month. Its a sad state this bowling is in.
--------------------
Bowling Tips and Articles at: www.bowlingknowledge.com
IRC: Internet Relay Chat on Dalnet #striketalk. 24x7x365
-
As some like to say---you had your day, now let us have ours. I dont necessarily think that way, its just that as you said---thats the way it is. I love these the way it was vs the way it is comments. And yet people keep abandoning bowling for golf---a game that has done the same thing. New equipment that acts like springs for the golf ball to shoot off of. So now all these old and young guys think they can hit the ball far---and yet if they were involved in the sport even 15 years ago, they would have had no prayer.
Sports and games evolve. Look at poker. Its a skill game thats "being overrun" by internet players, blah, blah, blah. Poker is still a skill game. The most skilled rise in the top situations. I dont see Joe Nobody on the pro tour winning anything. I dont see Joe Nobody winning any regionals. I dont see Joe Nobody winning any major side tournaments. When accuracy is important, the best shows themselves---even those who turn the ball with the newest ball on the market. When accuracy doesnt matter, take it for what it is---a recreational event where at league levels has lost a certain amount of credibility and yet tens of thousands still show up to have no credibility---what does that say about the state of the game???
--------------------
Only Losers Feel Pressure
www.thetimekillers.com
-
I am not sure how much technology is really involved for bowling equipment relative to say 10 years ago. I started bowling 10 yrs ago and the Rhino Pros, Quakes, and Reactive hammers had just come out. Even then, assymetrical balls were not new, look at the XS. Now, fast forward 10 years. We have 3-4 piece multiple density cores, slightly different formulations of superflex, and particle technology. Well, most particles can't usually be used on a THS unless you fluff the ball. So that really leaves the technology of assyms. But most area bowlers at my house don't throw those, they throw the absolutes, fired ups, Big Rigs. These balls are not that different than equipment from 10 years ago. Reactive with two or three piece cores.
So what is the deal? The shot. They put enough oil in the middle to swing if you have a ton of hand, and a dry bumper outside to get it back if you miss.
Dj
Edited on 10/3/2005 8:24 AM
-
They all combine together.
Synthetic lanes, lane machine that oil and strip, and the higher friction balls that take advantage of the conditions all lead to the big back ends.
I remember when we got the first nu-line x-caliburs. My proshop buy and I both got one and we were both straighter players. Automatically we had as much back end hook as anyone had at that time. We joked then about how they spent years developing their technique and we bought our big hooks out of a box.
Funny thing was they couldn’t seem to use the ball, they simply couldn’t control it. It wasn’t till later when they started running the lanes longer with more oil and the second generation of resins came out before the pre-resin boomers could use them.
I still think the scores come to easy. The youth bowlers reach the top too quick, get bored and quit.
-
quote:
I still think the scores come to easy. The youth bowlers reach the top too quick, get bored and quit.
I like that statement PB...you hit it on the head. It's why golf remains viable because quick and easy scoring in golf is not very attainable.
Scott
-
quote:
Why the difference in the two sports?
Ignore the scoring issues. It's because golf is a rich man's game and bowling is a poor man's game. Always has been, always will be. If you want to move up, you play golf with your boss. You don't take him bowling.
SH
-
quote:
As for why the kids quit, I agree to a point. The problem isn't that they get good too quickly and get bored. Rather they score high to quickly, giving them the impression they are better than they are. Then when exposed to more demanding conditions they are more disillusioned than we were when we had routine setbacks at every stage of our development
Good point Bob...the additon to PB's point all makes sense to me. Beginning golfers usually never score well and maybe will never be low hdcp. players nor get to the scratch level.
It is very easy to become a scratch bowler in a short amount of time. Not so with golf.
quote:
Scott, I agree with you about golf being difficult to reach a level of decent play and yet golf still enjoys popularity. Why then would not bowling become more popular if conditions were made tougher so it took longer to reach that 200 ave level?
Most of the comments on this board seem to indicate that mandating tougher conditions would only cause us to lose more bowlers.
Why the difference in the two sports?
--------------------
Bones
Doc--For me, it's the knowing going in when I hit the course that if I can even attempt to get close to par I will be very happy.
When I go to league, if I don't hit mid 600's it's a failed night. Back in the 60's-70's into 80's. If, I hit 600 I was a very happy camper.
It's the instant gratification thing now. If, one does not see immediate results the heck with it and you chuck it in.
Difference in two sports is:
Golf. Varied playing condition players expect it and get it.
Bowling. Bowlers want same condition want no variance. Expect the same condition time after time. For the majority anyway.
Golf. Played outdoors fresh air nice walk.
Bowling. Indoors smoke filled alleys at least in most parts of the country <city of Madison where I am from is smoke free for now>
Golf. Played with many different techniques and different club for every shot 14 to be exact.
Bowling. Some have aresenals but expect to play the same part of the lane for each and every type of shot.
Golf. USGA Hdcp. in my mind doesn't allow for as much sandbagging but it can occur. Take last five rounds drop the best and worst and average.
Bowling. USBC take all game divide by number of pins. Lots of sandbagging especially early in season.
These are just a few of the differences....lots more when I get some time. I am sure there are others. Others please chime in.
You will also note Doc that on this board BR there is a plethora of younger bowlers but on FGI there are very few young posters. Why is that Doc?
Scott
-
quote:
Ignore the scoring issues. It's because golf is a rich man's game and bowling is a poor man's game. Always has been, always will be. If you want to move up, you play golf with your boss. You don't take him bowling.
SH
It used to be shelly not much anymore. Lots of courses built for cheaper muni players. My area is over built with courses so it has helped drive the price down a bit and made it easy to get on any course almost same day without reservation.
Scott
-
On tough lane conditions such as sport or reverse block; strong high performance balls drilled strong don't work as good as weak balls drilled tame. Lane conditions can control the scores. I will take a mid priced slash drilled label over a any high performance ball drilled strong on a tough med oil shot.
--------------------
TAKE A RIDE ON THE TRACK EXPRESS!
THE REVOLUTION!
RIDE THE LIGHTNING!
-
quote:
Golf. Varied playing condition players expect it and get it.
Bowling. Bowlers want same condition want no variance. Expect the same condition time after time. For the majority anyway.
Golfers can see the variation and differences. Heck, each hole is different on the same course. They're used to every shot being different.
That's not true in bowling. We can't see the shot and without a lot of experience in reading lane graphs, it's guesswork how to play. Sure, good bowlers can score anywhere and given some time, most will learn the shot. We expect consistency in the lanes because we're taught that consistency is king and we have no other way to know what's going on.
SH
-
I don't see people getting "really" good and quitting.
I see guys cranking 190 to 200 that are terrible. Then they get on a more difficult condition and bowl 180 and minus. They quit.
But guys I see at 220 in general don't quit unless the requirements of their job make it hard to stay at that level.
rEgards,
Luckylefty
PS guys in our local YABA are averaging 210 + and coming out into classics and averaging near 240...they are not quitting. And I would not classify them as terribly innaccurate either. As accurate as me when I throw good ...no, but more powerful and quite accurate, my gosh yes!