Think about the things mentioned and how much focus some put on them and how little they truly matter with bowling balls and THS conditions.
People refer to the dual angle method like it does something different then just eyeballing a drilling. The D.A.M. and 4x4x4 and anything else are all different ways of saying the same thing. The D.A.M. method is a precise way that says the these drill angles give you this kind of reaction, this pin to pap difference effect it this way, then the VAL angle gives you these characteristics. You can do the same thing by eyeballing it, the ball doesn't know the difference. Duplicating it, the DAM would be the exact way, where as the eyeball method gets you in the ball park.
Now I have played with the BP software and tried using different pin to pap distances on the same layout, different MB positions, different side weights ect and it shows on a THS that the differences are minimal. Surface was always the bigger factor.