win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Fluffer VS open handed shots  (Read 1574 times)

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Former proshop worker
Fluffer VS open handed shots
« on: July 20, 2004, 11:02:56 PM »
Does open handing a shot make you a fluffer?

I don’t believe so, it simply means you do not accelerate your hand strongly thru the ball producing a lot of lift with the fingers. Instead you create revs and tilt by the quick rotation of the hand around the ball.

A fluffer gets neither a good quick turn nor lift in their shots.  

I would dare say you wouldn’t call Pete Weber a fluffer but is one of the best examples of bowler taking the hit out of his release.

 

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Former proshop worker
Re: Fluffer VS open handed shots
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2004, 02:36:11 PM »
Sawbones – I’ve seen bowlers I would can fluffers as well that had later releases but the just seem to get out the thumb and fingers at the same time so they never get good lift and turn on the ball.

Me personally, I don’t try to change my rotation so much as I try to feed the ball onto the lane rather than lift the ball out onto the lane. Like John Jowdy says about the ball landing like an airplane gliding onto the lane.

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Former proshop worker
Re: Fluffer VS open handed shots
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2004, 03:00:47 PM »
It seems with the lane surfaces and balls today it has changed.

Balls that are fed into the lane seem to hydroplane on the oil in the heads and don’t overreact to the dry.  

Balls that are lifted strongly out on the lane seem to land with enough force that they push the oil out from under the ball so it starts to roll earlier plus the when the ball finds dry boards it jumps more violently and erratically.  

There are always exceptions such as Mika and Walter Ray and it is still all about matching up your peculiar roll. But I know the majority of the national tour players are all trying to take the hit out of their releases so that they get a more readable consistent breakpoint.

mumzie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6914
Re: Fluffer VS open handed shots
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2004, 03:49:27 PM »
As far as "loft" - what may seem like loft to some people is just the "natural" landing spot for some bowlers - due to height or lack of kneebend, or in my case, both.
I have a teeny bit of kneebend, and I'm 5'11". the ball is following the proper arc, and is still being "landed" on the lane, not bounced - but it hits about 3 feet out, instead of right at my foot. I've watched it on video tape - and can see the difference.
But most people call it loft.
--------------------
All things are difficult
before they are easy.
---- Thomas Fuller
------------------------
www.Shirts4Bowling.com
We Know What Bowlers Want

Home of the HAMBONE shirt!

MSC2471

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2080
Re: Fluffer VS open handed shots
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2004, 04:39:27 AM »
Sawbones: I think with the newer resin and particle balls, to loft the ball further on the lane for drier conditions would produce a very hit or miss ball reaction depending on what you did in terms of hand release and speed. Playing more of a drag shot as John Jowdy described in Bowling Execution seems to be the better way to take the drier heads out of play while still receiving the mid lane and back end action desired.

As far as the open handing making you a fluffer, I don't buy the concept. As talked about in a previous thread, you can produce just as many revolutions with this release if not more than hitting up on the ball.

Matt