This question/topic/idea came to me as I was reading posts on this board regarding 'sandbagging'.
In golf, the USGA requires amateur golfers to use their LOWEST handicap when playing in handicapped events. For example, a golfer belongs to two different clubs. At Club A, he has a 7 handicap. At Club B, he has a 5 handicap. If he plays in any USGA governed event, he MUST use his 5 handicap in competition.
Should the ABC require a bowler to use his HIGHEST league average in all ABC sanctioned events and leagues for handicapping purposes?
For example...if a bowler bowls in three different leagues and has averages of 183, 186, and 189...should he/she be handicapped based on his/her highest league average of 189 for all leagues? Or, maybe, have a "house" average which would take into account all games bowled in all leagues and that would be his average, for handicapping purposes, for all leagues/events in which he/she bowls.
Certainly, there are some circumstances that this couldn't/shouldn't be followed like a Sport Bowling league...but for all other "normal" leagues, don't you think this would be a better/more equitable way to handicap bowlers?
I think this would certainly help to limit "sandbagging"...it could never completely be eliminated unless you get rid of handicaps altogher.
--------------------
That which doesn't kill you will only make you stronger, that which doesn't make you stronger is a waste of time!