win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Has anyone else heard?  (Read 1803 times)

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Has anyone else heard?
« on: January 23, 2005, 11:03:14 AM »
in my local newspaper, there was an article about the USBC or w/e, making all bowling balls after Feb.1 illegal, to even out the scoring. they said all bowling balls made before Feb.1 will be "grandfathered" in. correct if im wrong, or tell me if you heard also.
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

Edited on 1/23/2005 8:02 PM

 

Tons of Fun73

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2005, 07:05:15 PM »
wtf why would they do that

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2005, 07:05:44 PM »
they were going to do that to make lower scores. i will try to find a link to the newspaper to have people read it.
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

thfonz98

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2005, 07:05:57 PM »
making all bowling balls after Feb.1 illegal....what and kill bowling ball companies IF ALL BALLS WERE ILLEGAL....read it a little harder....its about balls with high differental cores.
--------------------
"Joey . . . have you ever seen a grown man naked?"-Captain Clarence Oveur

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2005, 07:07:13 PM »
i asked my pro shop guy, and he said it was any bowling ball with an RG above .03......which i thought was most balls.
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2005, 07:08:13 PM »
thanks, but does that mean balls like the Verigo and the Aces made after Feb.1 will be illeagal?
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

a_ak57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10584
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2005, 07:09:39 PM »
quote:
thanks, but does that mean balls like the Verigo and the Aces made after Feb.1 will be illeagal?
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

No.  The differential isn't above .060....
--------------------
- Andy


Brunswick..........'Nuff said.

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2005, 07:09:42 PM »
nevermind, those are .055 and .056...but what balls would be outlawed then?

--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

thfonz98

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2005, 07:09:56 PM »
(edited a little harsh the first time) try a search:
try: http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=72049&ForumID=5&CategoryID=2

or try: http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=72050&ForumID=73&CategoryID=2

or try: http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=71716&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5

--------------------
"Joey . . . have you ever seen a grown man naked?"-Captain Clarence Oveur

Edited on 1/23/2005 8:08 PM

a_ak57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10584
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2005, 07:10:47 PM »
quote:
nevermind, those are .055 and .056...but what balls would be outlawed then?

--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

NOTHING, unless a company is stupid, and after Feb. 1st they try to make a ball with a diff over .060
--------------------
- Andy


Brunswick..........'Nuff said.

thfonz98

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2005, 07:10:50 PM »
quote:
thanks, but does that mean balls like the Verigo and the Aces made after Feb.1 will be illeagal?
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough


NO, since they were approved BEFORE feb. 1st they are grandfathered in anyways.
--------------------
"Joey . . . have you ever seen a grown man naked?"-Captain Clarence Oveur

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2005, 07:12:05 PM »
oh, i was thinking that like if a ball was approved already, and was made after Feb.1, it would be illegal
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

XFactor3OO

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 14
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2005, 07:13:42 PM »
thanks everyone
--------------------
Strike for Show, Spare For da Dough

cgilyeat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2005, 05:04:43 AM »
Here's a litle more on this (grom the USBC):


On February 1 of this year, the maximum RG (radius of gyration) Differential
of bowling balls will be changed by the United States Bowling Congress from
0.080 inches to 0.060 inches.

The change was initially reviewed on Nov. 11, 2004, by the USBC Equipment
Specification and Certification Committee, which now has approved the
change. According to the committee, the new spec "will help control the
sport for many years to come."

According to the official USBC release, this bowling ball specification can
be found on page 13 of the Equipment Specification manual on Bowl.com.

What does it mean?

"In more bowling-friendly terms, bowling ball flare and entry angle will be
controlled," said USBC Senior Technician Jim Jaryszak, who is in charge of
bowling ball testing.

All bowling ball manufacturers have been notified of this change. Previously
released balls that have been approved will remain approved (grandfathered
in). Any re-release of a previously approved ball will have to be submitted
for testing and meet the new specifications.

When asked for a comment, one expert in the ball industry said, "That change
definitely is going to cut down bowling ball flare, and the ball is going to
be more stable as it rolls down the lane. Anytime you can stabilize the
ball, you put more of the skill factor back in the hands of the bowler."

"We have been looking at making this change for quite some time," said USBC
Director of Research Neil Stremmel. "This is a big step for our merged
organization under the new USBC, and we plan for this to be part of some
big-picture changes in the future."


Basically, this means that any new ball or release of an existing ball must meet the .060 limit.

Rev_O

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5060
Re: Has anyone else heard?
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2005, 06:02:22 AM »
anything manufactured before(this meaning on the market) before feb 1 is grandfatherd in. So if you buy a Vertigo(example only) after Feb 1, it would still be legal!!
--------------------
Rev-O


Track International Amateur Staff Member
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/nagyiii/detail?.dir=5406&.dnm=9e95.jpg&.src=ph