Bowler B's average isn't even higher than bowler A. So the situation is irrelevant to your question.
102 game season is 34 weeks
Bowler A bowled 36 weeks?
Bowler A at 36 weeks is 108 games for a whole league? (league is only 102 games/34 weeks)
Bowler B bowled 87 games?
Bowler B at 87 games bowled 29 weeks?
Is this some kind of coded bowling riddle? Nothing that you say in your post makes any sense or corresponds with each other.
"If you have a 102 game bowling season. Bowler A bowled 36 weeks with a 212 average. Bowler B bowled 87 games and finished with a 211 average. Which bowler would be entitled to the high average award ? Not sure of the rule thats why I'm asking ?"
Edited by Xx 12 X 300 xX on 4/18/2012 at 8:52 AM