If you have a 102 game bowling season. Bowler A bowled 36 weeks with a 212 average. Bowler B bowled 87 games and finished with a 211 average. Which bowler would be entitled to the high average award ? Not sure of the rule thats why I'm asking ?
most leagues have a rule of 2 thirds of total games bowled. 102x2/3 = 68 games to be eligible for end of year awards. check your rules or ask secretary.
We have the 2/3 rule in our league, too. We have a guy on our team who can only bowl every other week due to work, so he doesn't qualify for the high game despite being the only person in the league with 2 300 games. Stinks for him, but those are the rules.
Bowler B's average isn't even higher than bowler A. So the situation is irrelevant to your question.
102 game season is 34 weeks
Bowler A bowled 36 weeks?
Bowler A at 36 weeks is 108 games for a whole league? (league is only 102 games/34 weeks)
Bowler B bowled 87 games?
Bowler B at 87 games bowled 29 weeks?
Is this some kind of coded bowling riddle? Nothing that you say in your post makes any sense or corresponds with each other.
"If you have a 102 game bowling season. Bowler A bowled 36 weeks with a 212 average. Bowler B bowled 87 games and finished with a 211 average. Which bowler would be entitled to the high average award ? Not sure of the rule thats why I'm asking ?"
Edited by Xx 12 X 300 xX on 4/18/2012 at 8:52 AM
Sorry for the error. Bowler had 36 total games.
Maybe your question has been answered, but in most leagues bowler A would not be eligible for a high average award, although 36 games would qualify his average for handicap purposes.