win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: High or low track  (Read 3278 times)

matttt20

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
High or low track
« on: March 02, 2006, 05:29:31 AM »
quick question:

What is the difference in reaction and hook between the two? I have been told im a high track bowler but am not too sure what this actually means bowling wise. Just curous.

 

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8156
Re: High or low track
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2006, 04:07:33 PM »
Everything else being equal (speed, revs, ball, etc) the high track would roll earlier and the lower track would have more length.  The type of lane conditions would determine the amount of hook for each.  That is, on oilier lanes the high track may hook more since it is able to get into its roll sooner but on dry the high track may roll too soon and not have any left for the backend while the lower track would outhook it on this type of condition.

Hopefully, someone with more knowledge will correct me.


--------------------
________________________________________

I am the SGT Schultz of bowling.
"I know nothing! I see nothing! NOTHING!"
_________________________________________
I just want 2C was'zzub.
_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: High or low track
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2006, 04:12:36 PM »
That's pretty much the explanation.  The cause is that high trackers, for the same number of revs, will put more ball in contact with the lane than low trackers.  Track circumference is typically greater for high trackers, and so one revolution is a longer distance for us.  That's the big reason we get earlier roll; we create more friction between the cover and lane.

On the plus side, we get get more reaction for fewer revs than low trackers.  A low-track cranker is almost wasting revs, or the revs aren't doing as much work.

SH

BrunsMike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2785
Re: High or low track
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2006, 04:17:01 PM »
So since im a high track cranker, im getting more benifit??
--------------------
Mike Zadler
NE Lake County IL
Sanctioned Highs:
775 Series/288 Game
Sanct. Ave. (2004/2005)194

Tweener by day, Stroker by night
Mike Zadler

a_ak57

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10584
Re: High or low track
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2006, 04:27:39 PM »
It's not high track/low track so much as it is large track diameter/small track diameter (not taking into count resulting PAP's and layouts).  Someone with a small track but .5" from fingers and thumb will not get more midlane than someone who tracks 2" away but has a very large diameter.

IL, what shelley means is that if Large Track Joe has 15 hand revs on the ball (ball spins that many times on it's trip down the lane) and Small Track Bob has 15 hand revs, Joe will have more contact with the lane surface because of his track in comparison to Bob, so in effect Bob is "wasting" some revs because he doesn't get as much contact.  But if the condition calls for less midlane then Bob is at an advantage.  It's kind of the difference between forward and side roll, I guess.  Both have their uses.
--------------------
- Andy

Edited on 3/2/2006 5:17 PM

thedjs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: High or low track
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2006, 09:29:50 AM »

So if a low track bowler gets more length than a high track, would it then be better for them to have stronger drillings for earlier reaction?  What if the low track bowler has a large track area?

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8156
Re: High or low track
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2006, 07:41:58 PM »
thedjs, I am not a driller or really as knowledgeable as many others here but it seems to me that a stronger drilling for a low tracker would only make the backend stronger.  You want to get the ball into an earlier roll and that can be done by keeping the top weight low and using negative sideweight.  Something else that might help would be to have the CG out but that might mean using a weighthole (which could be used to reduce topweight and/or sideweight).  Also check out Ron Clifton's tips on finger dancing.

Not sure about the low track - large track as I have only seen low track - small track.
--------------------
________________________________________

I am the SGT Schultz of bowling.
"I know nothing! I see nothing! NOTHING!"
_________________________________________
I just want 2C was'zzub.
_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.